Democrats & Marxism

Understanding the "beehive" fantasy goal of the "secular progressive" Democrat Party

and the success of Communistic Goals


"Today's "Democrat" is can no longer be defined as "liberal or progressive." Democrats are tyrannical global Marxists.

"Fundamentally transforming America" from a Constitutional Republic into a Marxist Tyranny


  Home About Contact Search News, Commentary, & Action Recommended Books





Index (Below):

See also:

Democrat Socialism: A clear and present danger: Undermining Liberty and the Free Market

The Cloward-Piven Strategy: Orchestrated Economic Crisis to Advance Government Control

Democrat Racism & History of Slavery & Hindering Black Civil Rights

Democrat Depravity: Abortion, LGBTQA & Children, Indoctrination, more...  


Upfront -   Defining "progressive liberal Democrats:" Using tribalism to coerce Marxists

                  Democrats deceiving voters by using crafted terms of contradiction.


We're on Step 4 of homo-fascism's plan - By Scott Lively: Urges readers to 'break' LGBT-inspired laws so courts can overturn them ...For the left, and particularly its LGBT agenda-steering de facto "executive committee," the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow (of "utopian" social engineering) has always been the power not just to suppress all dissent, but to force dissenters to vocally affirm and parrot its narratives. That is the secret to understanding the rising tyranny of "mis-gendering" and "dead-naming" laws and policies, with much, much worse to come if they have their way. As I outlined in the preface to the second edition of my book "The Poisoned Stream," there are five stages of "homo-fascism": 1) Tolerance, 2) Acceptance, 3) Celebration, 4) Forced participation in "gay" culture, and 5) Punishment of dissenters. In America, that process started in the 1940s when notorious pederast (and "Father of the American Gay Movement") Harry Hay's Mattachine Society adopted "the right to be left alone" (the essence of tolerance) as its motto. This was not incidental, but part of a deliberate long-term legal and political strategy built upon SCOTUS Justice Louis Brandies' theory that a "right to privacy" could be found in the "penumbras" of the U.S. Constitution.


The Left's Long March Into Despotism - By Laura Hollis - The Left has become so certain of its moral superiority that previously sacrosanct principles have been sacrificed. Author and Christian apologist C. S. Lewis once wrote: "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own consciences."

   ...Over time, however, the Left has become so certain of its moral superiority that those previously sacrosanct principles have been sacrificed, one by one, on the altar of whatever utopic visions Leftists have for perfecting society. The hills Leftists have decided to die on now include abortion and infanticide, pornography and gender confusion in schools, exploiting children in dangerous and irreversible medical experimentation, homeless encampments and drug use in our cities, incentivized theft and other unpunished crime, open borders and unlimited illegal immigration, lack of election integrity, censorship of medical professionals, scientists and journalists who dare to question the prevailing government narrative, the politicization of law enforcement, and political persecution.

   ...The moral busybodies on the Left, to their chagrin, are not omnipotent; they resent that their objectives for a perfected society are continually thwarted by the limitations imposed by the Constitution; therefore they seek to undermine the Constitution wherever possible: by eliminating the Electoral College, changing the composition of the United States Senate, "packing"  the U.S. Supreme Court, federalizing elections and removing laws that protect election integrity, permitting illegal immigrants to vote, bypassing Congress and having a president issue countless executive orders.

   ...These ideologies share a number of disturbing traits with their Marxist predecessors:

   No. 1: Their adherents insist that implementation of these policies requires the dismantling of our constitutional order, including the elimination of freedom, individual liberties, private property and the rule of law.

   No. 2: Their leaders do not live by the standards they demand of everyone else; instead, they grow rich on guilt-driven donations, corporate sponsorships, and book deals; they purchase expensive real estate, travel around the world on private jets and enjoy first-class accommodations.


Being "Secular Progressive" is actually Marxism where the aim is to replace the Constitutional Republic with tyrannical control over freedom and liberty, utilizing double-minded rhetoric, crafted terms of contradiction, to fool their susceptible voting base.


Psalm 36:1-4 - To the chief musician, a psalm of David the servant of the LORD*. My heart thinks the transgression of the wicked says, There is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flatters himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity is found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are wickedness and deceit: he has left off to be wise, to do good. He devises wickedness on his bed. He sets himself in a way that is not good, he does not abhor awful things.

o "First they steal the words, then they steal the meaning." --George Orwell, "1984"
o "How strangely will the tools of a tyrant pervert the plain meaning of words!" --Samuel Adams, to John Pitts, 1776
o "Abuse of words has been the great instrument of sophistry and chicanery, of party, faction, and division of society." --John Adams Letter to J.H. Tiffany (31 March 1819)
o "We are apt to be deluded into false security by political catch-words, devised to flatter rather than instruct." --President James A. Garfield
o "One who deceives will always find those who allow themselves to be deceived." --Italian statesman and political philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli
o Since the left can't sell its ideas to the American public honestly, it's changing the definitions of words yet again to get its agenda passed. --Kay C. James
o Words have power: "Unlike conservatives, left-wingers understood the importance of language. They understood their branding was all wrong. --Neil Patel
o "He who does not bellow out the truth when he knows the truth makes himself the accomplice of liars and forgers." --French poet, essayist and editor Charles Peguy (1873-1914)

Also, when Democrats are implicated in corruption and their double standards, witness without fail Democrat modus operandi (M.O.): Interrupt , elude , evade, avoid, suppress, impede & deflect accountability and responsibility.   

The "beehive" fantasy vision of the Democrat Party: ("The Progressive Threat to the American Republic" by Ed Vitagliano) Woodrow Wilson, in 1912 when Governor of New Jersey, during his presidential campaign envisioned "where men can live as a single community, cooperative as in a perfected coordinated beehive..." Hillary Clinton's "It Takes a Village" is evidence of the same disturbing vision. John Burgess, a Columbia University Law Professor described in an 1890 wrote of the "perfection of humanity, the civilization of the world; the perfect development of the human reason and its attainment to universal command over individualism; the apotheosis of man" in "Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law." Burgess envisioned the means to rein in "We the people" was to dupe them into believing the government would only act for the "general welfare," thus making it possible to transform Americans into "We the serfs."

   In the America "beehive" individualism would not be tolerated. Natural Rights would be obsolete and unconditional obedience would be mandated with persecution of free speech to ensure the tyrannical operation of the "beehive." "We the serfs" in foolishly surrendering personal responsibilities would become dependent on government to supply our needs and wants at the expense of working and providing the cost of what the government would deem sufficient.

   Of, to, and by the people will be replaced by our obedience as subjects of a tyrannical serfdom. The Constitutional Republic that had provided the "American Way of Life," by the Biblical precepts it was based upon, will be replaced by a central tyrannical ruling class and a "rule of men" as opposed to "the rule of law" administered by elections of "We the people."

   The Democrat Party has been successful in creating a voting base of serfs through indoctrination vs. education, a Marxist news media, Marxist social media, et. al. and promises of "free" everything by taxing the rich, pitting "We the serfs" against "We he people," thus allowing to continue undermining the Constitutional Republic.

   The secular pride of tyrannical Marxist elite ruling class believe in an unlimited government of unbounded arbitrary mandates and regulations according to their humanistic "[im]moral compass" which rejects "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" and "Bill of Rights" necessary to sustain their tyranny.


Democrats agenda: Communist Goals - On January 10, 1963, Democrat Congressman Albert Sydney Herlong, Jr. (FL-4th) read into the Congressional Record 45 Communist goals to capture America. These included:

...24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them 'censorship' and a violation of free speech and free press ...

...16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights ...

...28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of 'separation of church and state.'" The Communist goals also included:

...17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

...18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

...19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under communist attack ...

...25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

...26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as 'normal, natural, healthy.'

...27. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a 'religious crutch.'"

Those Who Want to Destroy the Constitution - By Ben Shapiro ..The New York Times published its latest op-ed calling for the end of the Constitution of the United States. The authors, Ryan Doerfler and Samuel Moyn, teach law at Harvard and Yale respectively. They argue that the Left's progress has been stymied by constitutionalism itself. ...After all, they admit, "It's difficult to find a constitutional basis for abortion or labor unions in a document written by largely affluent men more than two centuries ago. It would be far better if liberal legislators could simply make a case for abortion and labor rights on their own merits without having to bother with the Constitution." ...The founders deplored the idea of an unfettered federal government ruled only by popular passions. That is why they put in place a system of checks and balances to forestall mob majoritarianism. ...The Left hates the Constitution... ...To the Left, the Constitution is a mere barrier against the utopian mission to restructure human relations, and ultimately, humanity itself. In this view, large government is to be the leveling force among human beings, cramming down the views of one half of the country on the other half. ...Dispense with the Constitution's limits on the powers of the federal government, and suddenly transformational change becomes possible.

Race Everywhere - By Victor Davis Hanson - ...Pause to reflect that America is the only successful multiracial constitutional republic in history. To survive in an increasingly dysfunctional and hostile world abroad, the unique idea of the United States requires concord. But national cohesion is only possible through citizens subordinating their tribal interests to a common culture. Only then do they cease being automatons of warring tribes and collectives. As the world becomes ever scarier, Americans must, as Benjamin Franklin once warned, hang together, or most certainly they will soon all hang separately.

The complete Sovietization of the Democrat party - By Patricia McCarthy - ...Every Democrat voted against prohibiting China from buying U.S. farmland. Every Democrat voted against a ban on selling our strategic oil reserves to China; Biden has nearly emptied our strategic reserves. Every Democrat voted against a bill stating that pregnancy is unique to biological females. Every Democrat is on board the for the sexualization of very young children, the authorization of pornography in elementary school libraries and the pharmaceutical and surgical intervention of gender transition even for children under twelve. Democrat-run states seek to mandate gender-identity education for young children.

     They all support unrestricted abortion up to and just after birth; they are in favor of infanticide. Every Democrat has voted against protecting those who refuse the COVID vaccine. They voted against stopping the government from monitoring and prosecuting the unvaccinated. The Democrats approve of the DOJ labeling parents who attend school board meetings as domestic terrorists. The Democrats all signed onto the entirely Clinton-fabricated Russia hoax. In short, the American Democrat party is in favor of the destruction of any and all traditional Judeo-Christian American values.

      ...The Democrat party has revealed its evil tendency toward totalitarianism. Every American should now be well aware that there are two distinct systems of justice in this country, one for conservatives, quite another for favored leftists. 


Tribalism has come to the West - Hostile and polarised, today's America reminds me of my Somalian clan - BY AYAAN HIRSI ALI ...And yet there is something very striking about tribalism: it is a basic human trait, like skin colour or gender. However, despite being the natural state of being for many humans, it is not a positive or helpful trait, particularly in modern times. Tribalism developed as an imperfect social survival mechanism in the early stages of human civilization. But in modern times, it can lead to social disintegration and severe violence between groups.

   The beautiful story of America, the reason so many people around the world still yearn to come here, is to a large extent founded on our rejection of tribalism and our establishment of civic, neutral institutions, based on the fundamental principle of equality before the law. These institutions are imperfect, of course, but they are far superior to the tribalism that rules other parts of the world. Our overcoming of such a natural urge is an accomplishment. 


Why Liberals Hate the Constitution  - by Frank J. Fleming - No matter how much liberals try to mystify the Constitution and obscure its meaning, hearing the actual text of the document quickly destroys that fiction. ...And so liberals hope that no one reads the Constitution and that everyone leaves all the questions of what the government can do to left-wing judges who will make decisions based on what they feel is right. Then liberals will be freed from having to get the consent of the unenlightened American public who give their kids Happy Meals and eat trans-fats. They will then have the ability to force people to do what's best and give the government all the power it needs for a better, more ordered, peaceful society. Until they're shipped off to the mines. 

Liberal Motto: Where You Can't Legislate, Regulate!

"Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face." --Thomas Sowell

Video: How the New American Left Plans to Gain Power - There's an effort afoot to fundamentally change the way our government works.

Liberalism: the religion of natural man - By A.J. Castellitto - "This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blas- phemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, high-minded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away." -2 Timothy 3:1,5
   ...They'll accept Jesus but only on their terms. Jesus must be conformed to their image. They don't want to acknowledge that a complete self-denial is the most essential spiritual consequence of giving yourself over to the higher power. They insist Jesus be incorporated into their way of living.  ...We naturally place our own wants and desires before all else, even before a saving deity.
   Liberals tend to fancy themselves as the epitome of rational wisdom. They view themselves as "enlightened" people. They firmly believe that a complete submission to their methodology will enable a fairly distributed, person-centered, needs-driven standard of living to flourish. Underneath it all, however, is an elitist, radically-motivated, power-grab reflective of a greater global political-social agenda.

Why Liberals Are So Obsessed With Racism, Homosexuality and Transsexualism - By John Hawkins - Conservatives care about logic. Liberals care about emotion. Conservatives care about whether a program works or not. Liberals care about how supporting a program makes them feel. Conservatives take the positions they do because they believe they're best for society. Liberals take the positions they do because they make them feel and look compassionate or superior to hold those positions. Once you understand those basics, it's very easy to see why both sides hold the positions they do on most issues and to comprehend why there's so little middle ground. Once you get the mentalities, you can predict where each side will come down on issues.   
   ...They're offering to take your money and give it to someone else. They're offering to take rights away from other people that they don't care about. They're saying people are racist, bigoted, sexist or homophobic for disagreeing with them. ... If you're not a Christian and have no moral qualms about gay marriage, it's easy to call for the law to crack down on bakers or wedding photographers who refuse to participate because they find it morally repulsive. The problem with all this pointless virtue signaling is that because there is no real cost to it, there are no limits to it. As long as liberals lose nothing by advocating a position, but get credit for being compassionate for taking it, why not go for it? The problem with this is that compassion, real or fake, has little to do with what makes a society successful. Capitalism is not warm and fuzzy.   

Thinking of joining the Democratic Party?

Watch this video.

 Following the lead of tyrants: George Soros and Saul Alinsky

George Soros -  Globalist, Enemy of the Free Market, Enemy of Sovereignty (any country), funding and working to "fundamentally transform" America's Republic into Marxism.

How George Soros and the  Shadow Party  Rule Over Democrats - David Horowitz said that funding from Soros's foundations shape much of the culture in today's American society, but the end goal behind it is much more sinister. "I'm a former radical so I know how sinister and evil and malevolent the left is," he said. The true agenda behind Soros and the "Shadow Party" Horowitz said, is to "make America a one-party state and to silence people like myself."

     "[Soros] put together a coalition like the Working Party, and then he has things like the Democracy Alliance, which is a $50 million operation where he funnels money into Democratic candidates," Horowitz said. "He's very obsessed with Secretaries of State because they control the election process. He owns the Democratic Party, [through] his networks," Horowitz said, adding that "it really would be impossible for any democratic congressman or woman to run for office, even an incumbent, and get elected without the support of the Soros network."

Saul Alinsky and "Rules for Radicals" - Alinsky's tactics were based, not on Stalin's revolutionary violence, but on the Neo-Marxist strategies of  Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Communist. Relying on gradualism, infiltration and the dialectic process rather than a bloody revolution, Gramsci's transformational Marxism was so subtle that few even noticed the deliberate changes.

12 Ways To Use Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals Against Liberals - By John Hawkins - ...don't lie or become an evil person like Alinsky, but learn from what he wrote and give the Left a taste of its own medicine.  

Marxist Allies: News & Social Media, Secular Corporations, Entertainment, & Sports

"The ruling class has the schools and press under its thumb. This enables it to sway the emotions of the masses." --Albert Einstein

Agree with us or else - Robert Knight ...The very first thing the communists did after the 1917 Russian revolution was to round up anyone who disagreed with them. They shut down newspapers and denied all public forums to dissenters. ...Google, YouTube, Instagram, Vimeo and Facebook routinely deplatform, demonetize and "shadow ban" conservative content. At the same time, they peddle leftist narratives such as the Democrat/FBI/media Russian collusion hoax and the Biden administration's "Zero Covid" strategy to force everyone to get vaccinated.


Corporatocracy: Tucker unloads on MLB, Delta and Coca-Cola and links to "lying" Biden - By Vivek Saxena ..."In a democracy, the people rule. If voters want something done over time, it happens. That's what self-government is. But what do you call a system in which all the major, really important decisions are made by big companies without any reference at all to what voters want? Well, that is not democracy. It's corporatocracy, and it's starting to look a lot like what we have now," he said.

   ..."As with so many big corporations, Major League Baseball believes it now has veto power over the democratic process," Carlson noted. He added, "How did we get here? It's not at all complicated. We have a new president now, and that president is willing to destroy even something as wholesome as the country's traditional game purely to increase the power of his political party. Just the other day, Joe Biden went on ESPN to demand that professional sports franchises boycott any state whose voters step out of line."

   ...The clothing company Patagonia, one of the 100+ corporations that have condemned Georgia, claimed in its own statement that American "democracy is under attack by a new wave of Jim Crow bills that seek to restrict the right to vote." The statement was a complete lie. Yet as a "source" for its claim, the corporation cited none other than The New York Times...See how it all works? The narratives begin with the Democrat Party, travel to the media and then wind up with America's powerful corporations. ...Apparently, every major American corporation is OK with any law or proposal, no matter how immoral or unethical, so long as it buoys the Democrat Party's narratives.


Judge torches 'dangerous' media for 'shocking' bias; 'NY Times, WaPo virtually Dem Party broadsheets' - By Jon Dougherty - ..."Two of the three most influential papers (at least historically), The New York Times and The Washington Post, are virtually Democratic Party broadsheets. And the news section of The Wall Street Journal leans in the same direction," the judge continued. "The orientation of these three papers is followed by The Associated Press and most large papers across the country (such as the Los Angeles Times, Miami Herald, and Boston Globe). Nearly all television, network and cable is a Democratic Party trumpet. Even the government-supported National Public Radio follows along," he added.

     Silberman also ripped Big Tech, which he accused of skewing news coverage "in ways favorable to the Democratic Party" while also employing censorship of disparate viewpoints and information. He referenced social media platforms, ban of the New York Post's explosive pre-election reports providing sordid details of contents found on a laptop abandoned at a Delaware computer repair show by Hunter Biden.

     "It is well-accepted that viewpoint discrimination "raises the specter that the Government may effectively drive certain ideas or viewpoints from the marketplace,'" Silberman wrote. "But ideological homogeneity in the media, or in the channels of information distribution, risks repressing certain ideas from the public consciousness just as surely as if access were restricted by the government."

     ..."It should be borne in mind that the first step taken by any potential authoritarian or dictatorial regime is to gain control of communications, particularly the delivery of news. It is fair to conclude, therefore, that one-party control of the press and media is a threat to a viable democracy," Silberman continued. "It may even give rise to countervailing extremism." He added: "The First Amendment guarantees a free press to foster a vibrant trade in ideas. But a biased press can distort the marketplace. And when the media has proven its willingness, if not eagerness, to so distort, it is a profound mistake to stand by unjustified legal rules that serve only to enhance the press, power."