He That Has Ears To Hear, Let Him Hear (Matthew 11:15-30)
Home | Search | Newsletter | Contact
49 abominable facts about Hillary the media won't tell you - by Jen Kuznicki - 49 abominable facts about Hillary the media won't tell you If you listen to the news, the only real reporting being done about Hillary Clinton has to do with her email scandal. Even though she violated the Espionage Act, the FBI refused to prosecute. Her family’s foundation is under heavy scrutiny. But did you know these other important points about Hillary’s life-long run to the White House? (See details at link covering the following.) ...Saul Alinsky ...Leftist Law Firm ...Israel ...Whitewater Scandall ...Fighting for women ...Black lives matter ...Muslim Brotherhood ...Gun Control ...The First Amendment ...Abortion ...Immigration ...Much more... ...49 abominable facts about Hillary the media won't tell you Hillary is a radical's radical, a compulsive liar, and is intoxicated by the accumulation of wealth and power. Her Marxist ideology and belief that destroying this nation from within is what has motivated and propelled her to become president of this nation. Anyone considering voting for this destroyer should have their heads examined.
Rabbi Jonathan Cahn reveals more similarities between Hillary Clinton and Jezebel. ...Contacting the Dead In Hillary’s book “It takes a Village and Other Lessons Children Teach Us” she describes séance sessions held in the White House with Jean Houston where she contacted the deceased Eleanor Roosevelt and Mahatma Gandhi. (More evidence? See https://goo.gl/7kf7Nh)
Behind the Scenes Following Her Election Loss, Hillary Clinton Suffered a Meltdown - By BOB ESCHLIMAN - There was a lot of confusion about why former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would abandon all of her supporters following her loss in last week's presidential election. Now, we may know why. According to multiple media reports, quoting unnamed Secret Service sources, Clinton flew into an obscenity-laced temper tantrum when she realized she had lost the election to Donald Trump. She pounded on furniture, threw objects around the room, and at one point had to be physically restrained from attacking her campaign manager, Robby Mook, and campaign chairman, John Podesta.
As R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. reported for The American Spectator: Sources have told The American Spectator that on Tuesday night, after Hillary realized she had lost, she went into a rage. Secret Service officers told at least one source that she began yelling, screaming obscenities and pounding furniture. She picked up objects and threw them at attendants and staff. She was in an uncontrollable rage. Her aides could not allow her to come out in public. It would take her hours to calm down.
According to talk radio host Todd Kincannon, a CNN reporter knew about the incident, but was prohibited from reporting it. He shared some of the details via social media: CNN reporter tells me Hillary became physically violent toward Robby Mook and John Podesta around midnight; had to be briefly restrained ... She was in a "psychotic drunken rage" according to my reporter friend. Doctor added sedatives to the mix ... The CNN reporter didn't fail to report it. His editors will not let him. CNN has banned all "Hillary in the bunker" stories.
Must See: "What difference does it make?" answered by Trey Gowdy
"Those people who want Hillary Clinton elected president, so that we could have our first woman president, seem to have learned absolutely nothing from the current disaster of choosing a president on the basis of demographics and symbolism." --Thomas Sowell
Election 2016: Dr. Sebastian Gorka (Threat Knowledge Group Chairman): Latest Clinton Emails Are ‘The .44 Magnum of Smoking Guns’ - “Listen to how she parses the words,” he said of Clinton’s defensive sound bites. “‘I did not receive or send information marked classified.’ That doesn’t matter. It’s not the marking that makes a government piece of information classified. It’s the nature of the information.” Gorka said Clinton’s email scandal is disturbing for two reasons. “Number One, if this is how she dealt with it when she was a Cabinet member, how is she going to deal with it if she’s Commander-in-Chief?”
47 Bodies Left in the Wake of Hillary Clinton: Part 1
47 Bodies Left in the Wake of Hillary Clinton: Part 2
WELL, EXCUSE ME! LOOK AT BIG MONEY TRAIL FOR CLINTON PARDONS - By GREG COROMBOS - 'Too powerful to jail'? Hillary and Bill still raking in cash 15 years after scandalous act - "A lot of people were shocked and then when they found out Denise Rich, Marc Rich's ex-wife, had donated $450,000 to the Clinton Foundation and another million to the Democratic Party right before that pardon took place. People immediately drew those connections," Schweizer said. "I think those connections are real, but that's not the end of the story." Namely, that the pardon is still paying dividends. ...It will ultimately be into the billions because, Schweizer says, Gilbert Chagoury has promised to donate a billion dollars himself to the Clinton Foundation. ...But the real total of Rich-related donations remains a mystery.
Hillary: If I Hadn't Taken Big Wall Street Donations, the 9/11 Terrorists Would've Won, Or Something - By Guy Benson - Priorities, etc. Setting all of that aside, and passing over Hillary's terrible spin about a law specifically named the 'Affordable Care Act' by its proponents, her worst answer of the evening may have been this one: Notice how she kicks off this answer about accepting massive Wall Street donations while claiming class warrior status by mentioning that a majority of her donors are women, prompting a wave of 'girl power' applause from people who seem to think this factoid is somehow significant. (Make no mistake: When she's in trouble, she and her allies have shamelessly played, and will continue to shamelessly play, the woman card). Then she transitions into indignantly asserting that the reason she's raked in so much Wall Street cash is because she represented New York on 9/11. She practically argues that taking in major contributions from the Goldman Sachs set is a way to "rebuke the terrorists." How unseemly. The journalists who were paid to watch the weekend forum were not impressed:
Hillary Clinton's Record of Malfeasance From Little Rock to Chappaqua — Will Any Scandal Stick? - By Mark Alexander - Long before the Great Prevaricator Bill Clinton and his chief administrator Hillary duped their way to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, their tenure in Arkansas was defined by relationships with radicals, real-estate shenanigans, drug dealing associates, Ponzi schemes and "lucky investment returns" such as Hillary's one-in-31-trillion cattle futures profits. However, none of that corruption stuck to the Teflon couple. What follows is a concise record of Hillary and Bill Clinton's deceptions, obfuscations and subterfuges, from Little Rock to Chappaqua.
Irresponsible Choices - By Thomas Sowell - With many people now acting as if it is time for 'a woman' to become president, apparently they have learned absolutely nothing from the disastrous results of the irresponsible self-indulgence of choosing a President of the United States on the basis of demographic characteristics, instead of individual qualifications. It would not matter to me if the next five presidents in a row were all women, if these happened to be the best individuals available at the time. But to say that we should now elect 'a woman' president in 2016 is to say that we are willfully blind to the dangers of putting life and death decisions in the hands of someone chosen for symbolic reasons. ... No public official should be considered to be above criticism – and the higher up that official is, the more important it is to hold his or her feet to the fire when it comes to carrying out duties involving the life and death of individuals and the fate of the nation.
Letters Hillary Clinton, Saul Alinsky correspondence revealed BY: Alana
Goodman - “Dear Saul,” she began. “When is that new book [Rules for
Radicals] coming out—or has it come and I somehow missed the fulfillment of
Revelation?” “I have just had my one-thousandth conversation about Reveille [for
Radicals] and need some new material to throw at people,” she added, a reference
to Alinsky’s 1946 book on his theories of community organizing.
...A self-proclaimed radical, Alinsky advocated guerilla tactics and civil disobedience to correct what he saw as an institutionalized power gap in poor communities. His philosophy divided the world into “haves”—middle class and wealthy people —and “have nots”—the poor. He took an ends-justify-the-means approach to power and wealth redistribution, and developed the theoretical basis of “community organizing.”
...The letters between Clinton and Alinsky can be read here: The Hillary Letters by Washington Free Beacon
Here they are: Hillary's 22 biggest scandals ever (See
coverage on each at the WND.com link.)
1) Clintons turn IRS into ‘gestapo’
2) Covering Bill’s dirty deeds
3) Looting the White House
4) Filegate: FBI files on GOP enemies
5) Hillary’s ‘Muslim Brotherhood princess’
6) Vince Foster’s 1993 death
7) Emailgate: ‘She should go to prison for this’
8) Chinagate: Sale of high-tech secrets
9) Travelgate: Always room for friends
10) Whitewater: Jail for friends, but not Clintons
11) ‘Landing under sniper fire’ in Bosnia
12) Hillary’s ‘missing’ law firm billing records
13) Pardongate: Hillary Senate contributions
14) Hillary’s cash cows and 9,987 percent profit
15) Clinton body count: ‘You find dead people’
16) Hillary’s radical pal, Saul Alinsky
17) Hillary laughs about defending child rapist
18) Hill ca$hes in: Iranian fundraising
19) Clinton Foundation: Scandals keep coming
20) Benghazi: 4 American lives lost
21) Peter Franklin Paul: Another Hillary friend goes to prison
22) Watergate: Fired for being a ‘liar’
Articles and more...
Click here for a video Compilation of Hillary Clinton Lying
Busted: Hillary's 'No Classified Material' Lie Now Disproven 1,000 Times Over - By Guy Benson - In March, Hillary Clinton asserted that there "is no classified material" on her private server. This, put bluntly, was a flagrant lie: ...In fact, her rule-breaking arrangement resulted in at least 1,000 classified emails passing through her vulnerable server, including data from five or more US intelligence agencies. Next, Mrs. Clinton claimed she hadn't personally sent or received any classified information via the server. This was also factually wrong: ...Casting about for a new excuse, Clinton then claimed that she hadn't trafficked in any materials that were classified at the time, only information that was retroactively deemed to be sensitive. Not only is her "at the time" explanation legally irrelevant (stay tuned), her spin was also false on the merits. Two Inspectors General flagged emails that contained highly classified information from the moment they were generated.
o I Was A Woman In The Marine Corps In the Mid-70s. Hillary Clinton’s Story Doesn’t Add Up - By Susan Hutchison - First, some context. In the wake of the Vietnam War, the United States military was having difficulty recruiting individuals for service. The draft had ended and the United States was shifting to an all-volunteer force. To boost numbers, the military began to recruit from nontraditional sources, and made it easier than ever for women to join. In spite of these realities, Hillary Clinton claims that the recruiter she talked to immediately dismissed her from consideration because she was told “you’re too old, you can’t see, and you’re a woman.”
This rationale for disqualification would not have come during an initial recruiting talk. With Mrs. Clinton’s college and law school credentials, a Marine recruiter would have quickly referred her to an Officer Selection Officer (OSO), who recruits future Marine officers. The Marine Corps at that time was very much in need of lawyers. It makes no sense that a recruiter would have rejected outright a female (very in-demand) Yale Law grad who had served on the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate investigation. The Marine OSO would have undoubtedly contacted her, and probably asked her to apply to be a Marine Judge Advocate General (lawyer), and would have been thrilled to sign her up. She likely would have been in Officer Candidate School as soon as her application was processed.
Secondly, the argument that her eyesight would have disqualified her is also specious. At the time, women did not serve in combat positions where eyesight was scrutinized. The Marine Corps had numerous positions which did not require even average eyesight, especially in legal work. And she wouldn’t have been disqualified on the basis of her eyesight after one conversation with a single recruiter, who was not trained to make such a determination. Lastly, one can become a Marine officer up to his or her 28th birthday, so her age (26 at the time) would not have precluded her from service.
o Hillary Changes Her Immigration Tune By Michael Swartz - If we told you that a 2016 presidential candidate said, “We’ve got to do several things, and I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigrants… Certainly, we’ve got to do more to our borders, and people have to stop employing illegal immigrants,” you would probably guess one of the GOP candidates. But while that may be the sentiment of a select few in the GOP field, the words were actually uttered by Hillary Clinton in 2003. ...Hillary’s new message is that she would “go even further” than Obama if Congress doesn’t act. “I will fight for comprehensive immigration reform and a path to citizenship for you and for your families across our country,” Hillary told a Las Vegas audience. This includes not only the parentsof so-called DREAMers but also illegal aliens who had already been deported but still have relatives here. “I want to do everything we can to defend the president’s executive orders [on immigration] because I think they were certainly within his authority constitutionally,” she added. “Legally, they were based on precedent that I certainly believe is adequate. And then still try to go further and deal with some of these other issues like the reunification of families that were here and have been split up since the last eight, 10, 12 years.”
o Veterans Say - Hillary Can't Hide from Her Failures! By Casey Harper - Could Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state come back and bite her with veterans in 2016? A conservative veterans group behind a new anti-Clinton video series thinks so. “As veterans, when we have friends who are still on active duty still going back to these conflicts without a clear mission it very much upsets us,” Dan Caldwell, Marine Corps veteran and legislative director for Concerned Veterans for America, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. ”The fact remains that Hillary Clinton was at the table and helped craft, drive, and implement a lot of these failed national security policies. She cannot walk away from that, and she cannot hide from that.”
o Exposing Hillary Clinton's Ties to Saul Alinsky & Communist Doctrine - By Leon Puissegur
o The Real Hillary Rodham Clinton Exposed - By Leon Puissegur
Guess Who Doesn’t Create Jobs According to Hillary Clinton BY ELIZABETH
ALLEN - Hilary Clinton definitely raised some eyebrows today while speaking
at a rally in Boston supporting Elizabeth Warren for Massachusetts Senator and
Martha Coakley for governor. It begs one to wonder if there are any true
liberals left in this country or if they are all just socialist. I am wondering
just who does create jobs in her world. Oh right, that would be government. She
didn’t just leave the business bashing at job creation. She went on to touch on
evil businesses that outsource and don’t want mandatory sick leave and increased
Via Politico: Clinton leaned in hard to modern progressive economic views in the speech. But one statement as she transitioned to a tough critique of trickle-down economics — “Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs” — later drew fierce Republican criticism and private whispers from Democrats that she was trying too hard at points in the speech. Clinton blasted trickle-down economics and tethered its supporters to outsourcing of jobs — a charge that Coakley’s team has used against her rival, Republican Charlie Baker. Clinton said trickle-down economics “failed spectacularly,” and she also hit progressive touchstones such as paid sick leave and raising the minimum wage. “Don’t let anybody tell you that raising the minimum wage will kill jobs,” Clinton said. “They always say that.” “I’ve been through that. My husband gave working families a raise in the 1990s,” Clinton said, saying she herself voted for raising the minimum wage when she served as a senator from New York. “Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs.”
At what point will the villainization of corporations and businesses backfire? If all of these things are forced through and government does, in fact, become the only job creator, who is going to pay for all of the government programs and employees? I do not know how she did in “arithmetic” in school, but in real world economics her policies plus the policies of her cohorts equal bankruptcy for America. I shutter to think what will happen if she becomes president. What do you think?
o Clinton Says Businesses
Don't Create Jobs (PatriotPost.us) - Clinton derided the
economic policies of Ronald
Reagan, which were the main reason for the economic boom and prosperity
enjoyed during her husband’s tenure. "Trickle-down economics," she sneered,
"failed rather spectacularly." The truth is just the opposite. Reagan
successfully reversed Jimmy Carter's economic malaise. Reagan wanted government
to get out of the way so companies and individuals could prosper. To do that, he
implemented massive tax reductions, deregulation and anti-inflation monetary
policies, which brought inflation down to 3.2% by 1983 and unleashed a historic
period of economic growth. Instead of learning from the economic success during
the Reagan years, however, Clinton advocates the opposite.
If she wins the Democrat nomination and, heaven forbid, is elected president, we can expect a continuance of Obama's failed economic policy. Yet she'll no doubt say one of her goals will be to “fix” the economy, which has suffered immensely under Obama. That will require more skillful navigation than she has so far shown ability to accomplish.
She and her leftist cronies believe that one way to create jobs is by increasing the minimum wage. Clinton asserted, “Don’t let anybody tell you that raising the minimum wage will kill jobs. They always say that. My husband gave working families a raise in the 1990’s ... and millions of jobs were created or paid better and more families were more secure." But the facts show otherwise. James Pethokoukis of the American Enterprise Institute notes, “From 1981 through 2007, the US economy created 50 million jobs. (Also the jobless rate fell from a high of 10.6% to 4.4%). Over that same time span, the minimum wage declined in value -- using the consumer price index -- by 30% since it only rose to $5.35 an hour from $3.35, while to stay even with CPI inflation it needed to rise to $8.43.” He further notes that, while the minimum wage was declining, there was an incredible surge of job growth, and median incomes rose by 40%. Furthermore, the Congressional Budget Office released a report earlier this year projecting that Democrats' desired 40% minimum wage hike would kill 500,000 jobs.
o The Only Transparent Thing
About Benghazi Is the Cover-Up (PatriotPost.us) Two years ago, jihadis
attacked the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya, killing four Americans – U.S.
Ambassador Christopher Stevens, his aid Sean Smith, and former Navy SEALs Glen
Doherty and Tyrone Woods. No doubt Hillary Clinton wishes the American people
would just forget what happened that night. After all, not only has it been two
years since the attacks but it’s only two years until the 2016 election. And
getting to the truth might impinge on valuable campaign time.
A new Benghazi bombshell reported by investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson has just made Hillary Clinton’s political life – and presidential campaign prospects – a bit more problematic. According to former State Department Deputy Assistant Secretary Raymond Maxwell, who was punished and then cleared of wrongdoing surrounding the failures in Benghazi, high level State Department officials took decisive action as events unfolded – not in getting to the bottom of the attacks, but in purging State Department records of any documents that might make Clinton look bad.
Mere weeks after the Benghazi attacks, the Accountability Review Board (ARB), which was investigating the attacks, asked the State Department to turn over relevant documents. According to the State Department, employees were ordered to cooperate “fully and promptly” with ARB’s request. Of course, this is the same State Department that blamed a coordinated terror attack on a YouTube video, scapegoating one amateur filmmaker for an entire administration’s incompetence, so naturally the whole “fully and promptly” claim should be taken with a spoonful of salt.
No, make that a boatload of salt. According to Maxwell, before ARB ever got its hands on those relevant documents, key State employees held an secretive basement meeting, where they combed through documents to remove anything incriminating before turning the docs over to ARB. Maxwell heard about the meeting and, on showing up uninvited, was told by an office director close to Clinton’s top advisers that the plan was to “go through these stacks and pull out anything that might put anybody in the [Near Eastern Affairs] front office or the seventh floor in a bad light.” The “seventh floor” was a reference to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Attkisson reports that soon after, two high-ranking State Department officials, former White House counsel and Hillary Clinton’s Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and Deputy Chief of Staff Jake Sullivan, joined the “meeting,” seemingly to see how things were going, then left.
In other words, the ARB, which, incidentally, never bothered to interview several of the most obvious sources, including Hillary Clinton, also may have been given documents that were purged of key information. We can’t help but ask: Among the 29 recommendations ARB issued to the State Department following the investigation, was “do not destroy evidence” one of them?
It’s disgraceful that, two years after the attack on a U.S. Embassy and the murder of four Americans, those who seem least interested in finding the truth are those in this administration and those who led the State Department at the time of the attacks. But then again, that’s not surprising. After all, the photo-op with those four, flag-draped caskets has passed.
Barack Obama pledged the utmost transparency, but the only transparent thing is that truth means nothing to this administration.
Thankfully, the House Select Committee on Benghazi, chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), will be investigating Maxwell’s allegations. And among the questions the Committee will ask, “What difference does it make?” will not be one of them.
“Hillary Clinton is America’s Most Famous Enabler of Abusive and Powerful Men”
- By Townhall.com
Staff - Townhall News Editor Katie Pavlich gave the keynote speech at this
year’s Network of enlightened Women (NeW) conference in Washington, DC. In her
remarks, she lambasted radical feminists for their hypocritical heroism of
figures such as former US Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Hillary Clinton, who
are anything but “women’s rights” champions.
...For defending a child rapist in the 1970s, Hillary Clinton also made Pavlich’s list of poorly characterized "women’s rights advocates." The Washington Free Beacon exposed the shocking story in June that Clinton once defended a man who raped a 12-year-old girl. The audio tapes reveal her laughing while discussing the case. Egregiously, Clinton went on to accuse the young girl of being “unstable” and desiring relationships with older men. Pavlich attacked Clinton for such callous comments: “She went out of her way to attack a 12-year-old child in the case. Sure seems like a champion for young women, right?”
But, as Pavlich points out, that wasn’t the end of Clinton choosing to brush sexual assault under the rug for personal or political gain: “For decades, Hillary willingly helped destroy the women who her husband, former President Bill Clinton, was accused of sexually assaulting or raping. Time and time again, instead of holding her husband accountable, she defamed his female accusers as mentally unstable loons looking for money.
Clinton repeatedly allowed women to be lied about, smeared and manipulated so that her philandering husband could hold on to power, which eventually led to her own power as a senator from New York, a presidential candidate and President Obama’s Secretary of State.” Leaving out facts that don’t fit their agenda is par for the course for radical feminists.
Pavlich concluded her speech by outlining feminism’s true goals and explaining that Marxism is the centerpiece of the modern feminist agenda: “Progressive women’s rights movements have hardly been about women’s rights, but instead a transformation of America and its society and the transfer of wealth through government force.” Pavlich encouraged students to bring this material and knowledge to their college campuses and help to defeat the liberal ideology that often depends on ignorance. Watch her entire passionate speech here:
How Hillary Clinton Enabled Hamas’ Construction of Terror Tunnels by Moshe
Phillips and Benyamin Korn - In a bombshell revelation, Dennis Ross, the senior
Mideast policy adviser to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from 2009 to 2011,
has admitted that it was he who was assigned the task of pressuring Israel to
ease up on its military blockade of Gaza. “I argued with Israeli leaders and
security officials, telling them they needed to allow more construction
materials, including cement, into Gaza so that housing, schools and basic
infrastructure could be built,” Ross revealed in the Washington Post on August
10. “They countered that Hamas would misuse it, and they were right.”
Not that Hillary’s State Department had been acting independently of the White House on the issue of cement. For example, Vice President Joe Biden told interviewer Charlie Rose on Bloomberg TV in 2010: “We have put as much pressure and as much cajoling on Israel as we can to allow them to get building materials” and other forbidden items into Gaza. But now that Mrs. Clinton is attempting to distance herself from the president’s debacles in foreign affairs, Ross’ admission shows that it was she who sent her personal envoy to push for a policy that ultimately enabled Hamas to build the terror tunnels.
Israeli officials have long been justifiably concerned about the danger of dual-use items such as cement. On the one hand, cement could be used for innocent purposes such as home construction, in the hands of a peace-seeking, trustworthy government. But in the hands of untrustworthy elements – such as the Hamas terrorist regime that rules Gaza – it could also be used for other purposes. Such as terror tunnels.
Unflattering: Hillary's Speaking Fee Demands Now a Matter of Public Record -
By Daniel Doherty -
Las Vegas Review-Journal exclusively reports: According to a May 31, 2013
email, Clinton’s standard contract usually includes:
* Round-trip transportation on a chartered private jet “e.g., a Gulfstream 450 or larger jet,” plus round-trip business class travel for two advance staffers who will arrive up to three days in advance.
* Hotel accommodations selected by Clinton’s staff and including “a presidential suite for Secretary Clinton and up to three (3) adjoining or contiguous single rooms for her travel aides and up to two (2) additional single rooms for the advance staff.”
* A $500 travel stipend to cover out-of-pocket costs for Clinton’s lead travel aide.
* Meals and incidentals for Clinton, her travel aides and advance staff, as well as all phone charges.
* Final approval of all moderators or introducers.
Huma and the Muslim Brotherhood - By Paul
Dowling - The Clintons & the Muslim Brotherhood - Bill and Hillary Clinton
are friends with Bassam Erstwani, chairman of the Dar Al-Hijrah Mosque of Falls
Church, Virginia, where three of the 9/11 hijackers worshiped. The friendship
dates back to their White House days. In 2012, Bill hosted Muslim Brotherhood
leader Muhammad Morsi at his Clinton Global Initiative conference. Morsi
was President of Egypt at the time. President Obama was speaking at the
conference, too, along with Mitt Romney and world leaders. The issue with
hosting Morsi was that he had already declared his intention to institute Sharia
Law in Egypt, as well as to fight for the release of the Blind Sheik, who
masterminded the bombing of the World Trade Center back in 1993.
What Motivates Islamists to Make Jihad? Doctrinaire Muslims know the Quran and base their thoughts and actions on its permissions and commands. Ibn Kathir, a highly influential Muslim, well-known for his Tafsir and his Signs Before the Day of Judgment, is widely considered an authoritative source by mainstream and radical Muslims alike; he maintains that Jews are worse than donkeys and that all infidels should suffer heavy casualties at the hands of Muslims. Of unbelievers, he writes as follows: “They are worse than grazing cattle. Cattle only do what they were created to do, but these people were created to worship Allah alone without associating partners with Him, but they worship others with Him, even though evidence has been established against them, and Messengers have been sent to them.” These are the kinds of words that motivate Jihadists to commit mortal acts against “infidels.”
A Short Bio of Hillary Clinton's Closest Confidante - Huma Mahmood Abedin (born July 28, 1976) came into the world in Kalamazoo, Michigan, but moved to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, at the age of two. Her father, Syed Zainul Abedin, was born in the part of India that would become Muslim Pakistan. He received an Ivy League Ph.D. from the University of Pennsylvania. Ms. Abedin's mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, was also from Pakistan and also received a Ph.D. from the University of Pennsylvania. Although Huma’s father has passed away, her mother still works at Dar Al-Hekma College in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Huma Abedin returned to the US to attend George Washington University, where she earned a B.A. While Ms. Abedin was a student at George Washington University, she was given a job with Hillary Clinton, working as a personal aide and erstwhile bodyguard. In 1998, she began work as Assistant Editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, which she did for 12 years. The White House was unconcerned, even though the Journal has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. But, of course, the Clintons have hosted emissaries of the Brotherhood in the White House. So, why would they bat an eyelash at Huma’s terrorist ties? Ms. Abedin still works as a political staffer for Hillary Rodham Clinton and was Clinton's Deputy Chief of Staff at State, while Hillary was serving as Obama's Secretary of State. Abedin is married to former Democrat Congressman Anthony Weiner.
Sidebar: the Goals of Global Islamism - Global Islamism has three main goals: 1) Muslim refusal to assimilate into the melting pot of any Western host country; 2) Muslim establishment of Sharia Law zones, in areas where Muslims deny the law of the host country; and 3) Muslim insistence the host country accommodate Sharia, due to principles of religious freedom. This is all part of the Brotherhood’s agenda to take the West by dawa—an aggressive form of pressuring “infidels” to adopt Sharia. The Brotherhood calls this the Grand Jihad within the context of Civilization Jihad. It is a form of cultural sabotage, the effects of which, at present, are playing out in France, England, Holland, and other countries. The idea behind infiltrating the West is to establish fifth columns to exploit Western-style religious freedom to gain ground institutionally, until it is too late and Western culture falls victim to its own support of minority culture.
More About Huma & Her Troubling Ties to Islamism - Huma’s Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs is a publication founded by Abdullah Omar Naseef, a rich Saudi who backs al-Qaeda. He is Secretary General of the Muslim World League, a joint venture of the Muslim Brotherhood and Saudi Arabia. Naseef hired Huma Abedin’s parents to run the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs back in the 1970s. This journal has been instrumental in building and promoting global Islamism. This connection between Naseef and Abedin is worrisome, in light of Abedin’s connection to Hillary. Another terrorist enabler connected to both Abedin and Naseef is Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist networks. Qaradawi has been officially classified as a facilitator of terrorism. So, just how active is Huma Abedin in Brotherhood affairs? Also, how might her deep Islamist ideology influence the thinking of Hillary Rodham Clinton? The ultimate question, however, might be this: Knowing what we do about Huma Abedin, do you think a vote for Hillary, in 2016, is worth the risk? *Sura Al-Anfal (Arabic: سورةالأنفال, Sūratu al-Anfāl, The Spoils of War) is the eighth chapter of the Quran, containing 75 verses. It is a Medinan Sura and was finished after the Battle of Badr. The Sura following it, the ninth chapter of the Quran, is called At-Tawba and is considered to be a companion to Al-Anfal.
Hillary Clinton is so nasty to the Secret Service that they consider it
punishment to be assigned to her - By
Kurt Wallace - In “The
First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of the
Presidents,” New York Times bestselling author Ronald Kessler gives an
inside look at what the Secret Service experiences based on exclusive,
on-the-record interviews. Kessler writes, “When in public, Hillary smiles and
acts graciously. As soon as the cameras are gone, her angry personality,
nastiness, and imperiousness become evident.” Kessler interviews agents who
describe Clinton telling Secret Service agents to “f*** off” simply for saying
“Good morning, ma’am” during the Monica Lewinsky scandal. “Hillary was so
mistrustful and vengeful” said a former agent to Kessler. ...alleges that former
first lady and secretary of state Hillary Clinton is extremely abusive and
condescending to the very people assigned to protect her–the Secret Service.
...She claims to be a champion of the little people. She says her policies are going to help the middle class. There’s all this discussion about whether disconnected from the ordinary person simply because she wealthy. That’s not the issue. The issue is she’s openly hostile to, mean to, nasty to, little people who try to not only help her, but would lay down their lives for her. That is something that people need to focus on just as people needed to focus on the fact that Richard Nixon was involved in the so-called ‘Checkers’ ethics episode before he was elected and, sure enough, he gave us Watergate.
of Feminism Written By Laurie
Higgins - Hillary Clinton infamously said that abortion should be legal,
safe, and rare. She also said that conception marks the beginning of “potential
life.” If the union of egg and sperm, which creates something actual that
possesses the full genetic code of a new human being, does not in Clinton’s view
mark the start of an actual human life, one wonders when Clinton thinks
potential life becomes actual life. Perhaps this short and remarkable
video can illuminate for Clinton a truth about the actual lives of preborn
babies the intentional killings of which should not be rare but unthinkable:
Some intrepid reporter should then ask Clinton these questions:
- Does this video depict an actual human being?
- Does this human being have any inherent rights based on his or her status as a human?
- Does the absence of full development abrogate a person’s right to exist?
- Does a person’s location abrogate his or her right to exist?
- If one person’s right to control her reproductive system comes into direct conflict with the right of another human (less mature, less free, and more vulnerable) simply to exist, which is a right of a higher moral order?
- Is the legal right to have one’s child killed in utero progress? Or does the legalization of the “right” to legally kill one’s own child demonstrate the expansive capacity of humans to rationalize evil?
Though the most loathsome of all the fetid fruits of feminism, abortion is just one of many. Feminism, which gave America dead babies on a metaphorical platter gilded with silver-tongued sophistry, has rarely been noted for either its moral rectitude or intellectual consistency. While feminists claim to value women, most support the murder of preborn girls. While they claim to value female empowerment, many support the objectification of women through pornography. While they claim to value freedom, choice, and diversity, many derogate the choice of unselfish domesticity and ridicule those who believe sexual activity is appropriate only between one man and one woman within the context of conjugal marriage.
It’s hard to believe that so many Americans have been duped by what is commonly referred to as “second wave” and “third wave” (with its worship of gender ambiguity and “sex positivity”) feminism into believing that women in the 21stCentury are better off than women in, say, the 1950’s. Yes, in the 1950’s it was difficult for women to enter male-dominated professions or rise to the upper echelons of corporate America, men made sexist jokes, and little women couldn’t play peewee football. But…
- In the 1950’s, women weren’t slaughtering 1,300,000 of their own babies every year, approximately half of which are girl babies whose own mothers rob them of their right to an “empowered” existence.
- According to the Guttmacher Institute, the maternal death toll due to illegal abortions in 1950 was 300, and by 1965, eight years before Roe v. Wade legalized abortion in every state without restriction, deaths due to illegal abortions dropped to just under 200. “Progressives” think the intentional killing of 56 million babies is justified to prevent the unintentional deaths of 9,600 women—all in the name of freedom, choice, and empowerment (also known as selfishness).
- Women in the 1950’s weren’t so delusional as to believe that appearing in pornography constitutes empowerment.
- Women in the 1950’s weren’t so delusional as to believe that watching porn with their boyfriends and husbands is healthy and good.
- The concept of “feminist porn” would have been both oxymoronic and moronic to most pre-1960’s women who held modesty and self-respect in higher esteem and, therefore, would have recoiled at the objectification of women that “feminist porn” represents for both actors and viewers.
- One in three women in the 1950’s weren’t raising their children without fathers.
Feminists have helped women scale boardroom walls and smash glass ceilings to smithereens. They’ve helped women tear up basketball courts during their college years. And they’ve made it possible for little girls everywhere to achieve their lifelong dreams of serving in combat and stripping naked to have sex on camera for the lascivious eyes of men and now of women who are becoming more like men in their most brutish states.
Pay no attention to the bloody, dismembered bodies of tiny humans whose brutal killings represent freedom and empowerment to women who have become both more selfish and more enslaved to men, the government, and their own untethered appetites.
Hillary's Hypocrisy: She Criticizes U.S. Messaging to Arab World Now After Doing
Little While Secretary of State - - By
Helle Dale - Daily Policy
Focus: Congress is working to reform the Broadcasting Board of Governors and the
$700 million operation it oversees—legislation passed the House last week on a
voice vote. And officials have begun to point out Clinton could have done much
more to aid the operation. She sat on the board for six years while she was
Secretary of State but attended only two meetings in that time, and both were
described as highly scripted events. The two undersecretaries for public
diplomacy under Clinton also attended only a few board meetings each. Neglect
and inattention from State allowed the BBG and its staff to pursue their own
“It is hard to take seriously her criticism of BBG or VOA when she simply never attended a meeting [when] she was a member or advocated her views to us in any serious format,” former Broadcasting Board of Governors member board member Victor Ashe told the Washington Times on Monday. “Had she attended, we would have adopted her advice and agenda, in all likelihood.” In the massive failure of the Obama/Clinton Middle East policy, which has left the region vulnerable to the advance of radical Islamists, international broadcasting is but a small factor. U.S. broadcasting to the Middle East leaves a lot to be desired, but it is hardly the only reason the region is in turmoil.
Other reasons include the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq (and Afghanistan), inaction and inconsistency relating to Syria and weakness in dealing with Iran. Hillary Clinton is right about the BBG, but she fails again to take responsibility. She could have had a voice and made a difference as Secretary of State. There is no evidence she even tried.
o Hillary Let Hamas Build Tunnels (PatriotPost.us) Hillary Clinton could have prevented the current war between Gaza and Israel if she did nothing. Back in 2012, Israel and Hamas were at it again. Yet, Clinton forged a peace deal. Success, right? Sure, temporarily. As part of the deal, Israel agreed to allow building supplies back into Gaza. Hamas pinky-promised the building material would be used to build hospitals and schools (aka human shields in Hamas-speak). But the concrete and steel went underground to build Hamas' tunnels instead. Investor’s Business Daily reports, “Yet, laughably, Clinton is using her 2012 cease-fire deal to shore up her presidential bona fides. She boasts in her new biography that ‘my diplomatic intervention was the only thing standing in the way of a much more explosive confrontation.’” Didn’t her husband label Hamas a terrorist organization? More…
Millionaire ‘Gay’ Tim Gill Gets Behind Hillary Clinton Run - By fyork
- Tim Gill, the co-founder of Quark, the software company has just become one of
the first donors to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. At this point, he
has contributed the legal limit of $25,000. Gill is a rabid homosexual activist
who has used his millions to help elect “gay” candidates around the country –
and to fight for the legalization of so-called “same sex marriage.” Before the
2008 presidential election, Gill decided to back Obama and other leftist,
pro-homosexual candidates who could be placed in positions of power to promote
An article posted in The Atlantic in 2007 revealed Gill’s stealth strategy of funding political candidates to promote his vision of a nation that embraces sodomy as a positive virtue. Of course, Gill isn’t the only homosexual to promote Obama’s first presidential run. It was Hollywood homosexual David Geffen who urged Obama to run for office – and vowed to raise millions on his behalf. Geffen’s role in pushing Obama is chronicled in Hollywood Hypocrites by Jason Mattera. Geffen had previously supported Bill and Hillary Clinton in their joint run for President of the United States. The Clinton’s were enthusiastic supporters of the sodomy movement and continue to be so today.
We can expect Gill and Geffen to pour millions into the coffers of Hillary’s political campaign for the presidency – and hundreds of thousands of other sodomy activists will undoubtedly line up behind Hillary. Of course, while “gays” will rush to support Hillary, there are “Republicans” who are also working to normalize homosexuality in America. One of them is Paul Singer, the president of the New York-based Elliott Management. He just gave $1.75 million to the American Unity PAC, a political action committee that is pushing Republicans to support so-called “same-sex marriage.” Singer has also given to the Republican Governors Association, which is led by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. Expect Gill’s and Geffen’s millions to be used by Hillary to puff her candidacy – and be used to smear social conservatives who oppose her. (See the Tim Gill page on EarsToHear.net.)
WHAT CRITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON SHOULD BE ‘ALLOWED’ TO SAY - By
John Hayward - Hillary
Clinton’s bad day has been grinding along for two months now, with no sign of
the sun getting anywhere near the western horizon. Her latest misadventure
flows from a strategic decision to handle a spate of “anti-Clinton books” – the
most successful of which, Ed Klein’s “Blood Feud,” has been selling better than
Hillary’s own book – by forming a united front with husband Bill and daughter
Chelsea to portray themselves as a family under siege by literary predators.
It’s a defensible idea for a strategy, but unfortunately the husband in this
family is the Perjurer-in-Chief, so when he and the severely truth-challenged
Hillary team up to call anyone else a “liar,” the effect is much more comical
than what they’re shooting for. It also took an ugly totalitarian turn, which
doesn’t sit well with the image of power, privilege, and arrogance Hillary is
trying to escape from.
...The statement, as related by Politico, covers Klein’s book, plus “Clinton Inc.” by Daniel Halper, and an upcoming title by Ronald Kessler: In a squeeze on mainstream media, the Clintons added of the authors: “Their behavior should neither be allowed nor enabled, and legitimate media outlets who know with every fiber of their being that this is complete crap should know not to get down in the gutter with them and spread their lies. But if anyone isn’t sure, let’s strap all three to a polygraph machine on live TV and let the needle tell the truth.”
...Their behavior shouldn’t be “allowed?” It’s remarkable how fundamentally Democrat politics has grown incompatible with free speech and the First Amendment. This is really not the right moment for anyone on the Left to shriek about what anyone else should be “allowed” to say, especially not someone with Hillary Clinton’s image problems. I can’t think of a worse turn of phrase for her defenders to use, short of encouraging that the offending books should be burned under giant banners of Hillary’s stern visage.
Hillary: We Can't Allow People to Hold Wrong Opinion on Guns - by Tad
Cronn - Hillary Clinton, the unindicted Benghazi co-conspirator who wants to
be our next president, previewed on CNN the bent liberal logic that would be the
hallmark of her Administration should America suffer another brain aneurysm and
elect her. During the CNN Townhall event Monday, Clinton was asked by an
audience member about her feelings on gun control issues like large-capacity
magazines, and Clinton took the opportunity to vent her spleen against Americans
who dare to support gun rights. "I’m well aware that this is a hot political
subject," she said. "And again, I will speak out no matter what role I find
myself in But I believe that we need a more thoughtful conversation. We cannot
let a minority of people – and it’s, that’s what it is, it is a minority of
people – hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people." Liberal
political statements often reflect an addled state of mind, and Clinton's is no
...Perhaps the ultimate expression of this desire to suppress wrong thinking is taking form in the laboratories of DARPA, which is working on a brain chip that is meant to delete selected memories. It sounds like science fiction, but it's apparently been used successfully on mice and is moving toward reality for humans. The excuse is that such a device would be useful in treating post-traumatic stress disorder by simply deleting unpleasant memories. This all gets into the Transhuman movement and other issues, but the ultimate goal is straightforward: programmable humans. It's a liberal dream come true, and it naturally lends itself to liberalism, which depends on ignorance and even fear of history, religion, tradition -- things that could be deleted. Conservatism, on the other hand, is based on a respect and love for those things, emotions and knowledge that have to be learned. "We cannot allow" is Clinton's mantra these days. We cannot allow freedom, we cannot allow questions about Benghazi, we cannot allow any deep thoughts at all. Yes, a brain-erasing chip would be the perfect campaign handout. What we really cannot allow is President Hillary
o Clinton: I’m Not ‘Truly Well Off’ - BY: Washington Free Beacon Staff - Hillary Clinton, who has a net worth upwards of $50 million, said in an interview that she is “unlike a lot of people who are truly well off.”
o The Clinton Rule (PatriotPost.us) During Bill Clinton’s presidency, he and Hillary famously supported a high estate tax on inherited wealth – which includes many a family-owned small business. The Clintons may have left the White House “dead broke,” but today the fabulously wealthy pair are hypocritically seeking to minimize their own tax burden. Bloomberg reports, “To reduce the tax pinch, the Clintons are using financial planning strategies befitting the top 1 percent of U.S. households in wealth. These moves, common among multimillionaires, will help shield some of their estate from the tax that now tops out at 40 percent of assets upon death.” What about the Left’s sacred Buffett Rule? Why are the Clintons not paying their fair share? More…
o Terrifying Video Sheds More Light on our Future - By Onan Coca - A few weeks ago we showed you a video that should terrify every American. College age young people who support Hillary Clinton and yet have NO IDEA WHY. Well folks, things haven’t gotten any better in the last month. Intrepid videographers Danielle Saul and Carmela Martinez interview some Hillary Clinton supporters at a book signing in Arlington, Virginia. I think you’ll be amazed by the thoughts of the people who are choosing the leaders of our nation. Do I even need to say that we’re in more than a bit of trouble?
The Disgusting Shamelessness of Hillary Clinton - By Onan
Coca - A group calling itself “Faith
Voters for Hillary” just tweeted out this disgusting image of what can only
be called the most shameless political quote of all time. Hillary Clinton
actually said… “The Bible was and remains the biggest influence on my thinking.
I was raised reading it, memorizing passages from it and being guided by it. I
still find it a source of wisdom, comfort and encouragement.”
If the Bible guides her thinking, then she has obviously misunderstood the passages about homosexuality, marriage, murder and lying. As one of the chief proponents for abortion in the Democrat Party, she has helped to murder millions of helpless innocent children. As a leader in the fight for gay activism, she has brought about the degradation of the American family and the perversion of the Biblical definition of marriage. God in the Bible clearly teaches that marriage is a covenant between a man, a woman and Himself. It is a supernatural union created by God to teach humanity about our Creator and to express the truths of who God is. Hillary Clinton and her cronies in the Democrat Party are perverting the very truth of what God teaches in Scripture.
Victim Of Pedophile Rapist: ‘Hillary Clinton Took Me Through Hell’ - Hillary
Clinton is a champion for women’s rights. Except when she isn’t.
Josh Rogin, Daily Beast: The victim in the 1975 sexual abuse case that
became Clinton’s first criminal defense case as a 27-year-old lawyer has only
spoken to the media once since her attack, a contested, short interaction with a
reporter in 2008, during Clinton’s last presidential campaign run. Now 52, she
wants to speak out after hearing Clinton talk about her case on newly discovered
audio recordings from the 1980s, unearthed by the Washington Free Beacon and
made public this week… In a long, emotional interview with The Daily Beast, she
accused Clinton of intentionally lying about her in court documents, going to
extraordinary lengths to discredit evidence of the rape, and later callously
acknowledging and laughing about her attackers’ guilt on the recordings.
“Hillary Clinton took me through Hell,” the victim said. (Read
the whole thing.)
We’ve all seen what happens to women who make trouble for the Clintons by telling the truth. They’re called lying whores, they’re excoriated, they’re mocked on late-night TV. That’s a bit tougher to do when it’s the victim of a pedophile rapist, but I don’t doubt that Hillary’s supporters will do their worst. They want her in the White House, and they’re not going to let some hillbilly slut get in the way. Just imagine if this had happened to you as a child, and then, decades later, you heard this:
o Hillary's Flip-Flop
what we know about Hillary Clinton’s views on same-sex marriage thanks to NPR’s
Terry Gross, who put the screws to the presidential hopeful: Hillary’s views
have evolved. Growing up, Hillary never imagined same-sex marriage. Her husband
signed the Defense of Marriage Act in 1993. As secretary of state, Clinton said
she didn’t talk about same-sex marriage because she was championing “LGBT”
rights internationally. When she stepped down in 2013, Hillary said she publicly
supported same-sex marriage and she was happy when DOMA was repealed. She admits
the social change “has been an extraordinarily fast, by historic terms social,
political and legal transformation.” But now she criticizes people in, say,
Texas who “believe they have a direct line to the divine” and who “operate in an
evidence-free zone” when it comes to the issue. You’d expect someone who
completely changed her mind in 20 years would have some understanding, but the
winds of public opinion have shifted and Hillary once again sails with the wind.
(...EarsToHear.net note: HIL NIXES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BY JOEL SIEGEL NEW YORK DAILY NEWS Tuesday, January 11, 2000 - Hillary Rodham Clinton said yesterday she opposes legalizing same-sex marriages but supports allowing homosexual couples to share government and health benefits the way husbands and wives can. "Marriage has got historic, religious and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman," the First Lady said in White Plains. "But I also believe that people in committed gay marriages, as they believe them to be, should be given rights under the law that recognize and respect their relationship.)
Dinesh D'Souza's 'America' to Explore Hillary Clinton's Teenage Years (Exclusive
Video) Dinesh D’Souza is planning to go where NBC and CNN feared to tread:
an on-screen portrayal of Hillary Clinton. Ten months ago, NBC and CNN, under
immense pressure from both the right and the left, famously ditched their
planned projects focused on the former first lady, U.S. senator and secretary of
state. But a portion of D’Souza’s upcoming documentary, America, features
Clinton as both a teenager and a college student, played both times by a
22-year-old novice actress named Jennifer Pearson.
In America, D’Souza attempts to debunk arguments he says the political left makes to demean the U.S., including its motives and its history. In the one-minute scene embedded below, a youth minister tells a 14-year-old Clinton that he’s excited for her to meet someone, then a door opens but the clip ends before the meeting takes place. D’Souza, the conservative filmmaker who was also behind the surprise hit movie, 2016: Obama’s America, tells The Hollywood Reporter that the person on the other side of the door is leftist icon Saul Alinsky. What happens after that, D’Souza won’t say, but there are plenty of clues in America: Imagine a World Without Her, his just-published book in which the film is based.
In D’Souza’s book he analyzes Alinsky’s most famous book, Rules for Radicals, beginning with the often overlooked fact that it was partially dedicated to the devil, because, as Alinsky put it, he was "the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom." D’Souza writes that Alinsky taught "that the task of the radical is to turn middle class people against themselves, to make them instruments of their own destruction," and that the four steps to accomplishing that goal are polarization, demonization, organization and deception.
All of this is relevant, D’Souza says, because Clinton first met Alinsky as a young teenager, as depicted in the movie, then reconnected with him in college. She was so influenced – D’Souza says "radicalized" – by Alinsky that she wrote her undergraduate thesis on him.
When 1960s activists like Clinton sought Alinsky’s counsel, he told them, according to D’Souza: "You can be revolutionaries, but you should not look or act or smell like revolutionaries. Take baths. Use deodorant. Cut your hair. Put on ties and dresses if you have to. Don’t use obscenities. Don’t call the police ‘pigs’ and U.S. soldiers ‘fascists.’ Feign an interest in middle-class tastes; in other words, pretend to be like the people you hate."
D’Souza’s point in the book -- and one he makes in the movie, too -- is that if Clinton is elected president in 2016, she’d be the second U.S. president in a row who would be an "Alinskyite," the first being Barack Obama. "In this case, Alinsky’s influence will have taken on a massive, almost unimaginable, importance," D’Souza writes. "Obama will have had eight years to remake America, and Hillary will have another four or perhaps eight years to complete the job. Together, these two have the opportunity to largely undo the nation’s founding ideals."
o Hillary would
make Nixon look like a saint - By Larry
Klayman - The possible election of the female partner of the Bonnie and
Clyde duo of Bill and Hillary Clinton would usher in the death knell of the
United States of America. Having fought the Clintons tooth and nail during the
1990s, and having pursued them for their commission of a host of crimes, ranging
from Whitewater, to China-gate, to Travel-gate, and Monica Lewinsky-gate to name
just a few of the 40 or so of their misdeeds, I speak from experience.
And, why does Hillary have such a good chance of being elected president in 2016? First, she is a woman and would likely get a great percentage of the female vote. And, the Clintons' ruthless style of politics and intimidation is no match for the hapless Republicans, the gang who can't shoot straight and are quite good at self-destructing – not to mention the lack of real principles among the ruling Republican establishment, which is more interested in lining the pockets of themselves and the likes of their ally Karl Rove than doing good for the country.
Coming after the failed presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama, a second "Clinton presidency" would be disastrous, not just because they would resume their practice of selling off anything of value for their political expediency – as they did with the Communist Chinese, with pardons, Commerce Department trade missions seats, overnight stays in the White House's Lincoln Bedroom, judgeships, commissionerships, Cabinet secretary spots and anything else under their control – but because they have no moral compass. For the Clintons, and Bill would undoubtedly be right there at Hillary's side, anything goes to further their hubris and hungry thirst for power. And, while they are not black Muslim-sympathizers like Obama and his racist comrades, Hillary has a documented certifiable history of taking money from Islamic interests, not just the Communist Chinese. In effect, the entire country would be put up for sale at a Bonnie and Clyde auction to further subjugate the American people to political slavery under their rule.
Yes, by the standards of yesteryear, Richard Nixon is not a crook, and whatever his shortcomings, Tricky Dick at least was not a traitor. Hillary Clinton, following the lead of her corrupt predecessors and her own felonious history and continuing modus operandi (and Benghazi is just one recent example during her tenure as Obama's secretary of state), would make Nixon look like a saint. All of this is why We the People must wage our Second American Revolution now, before it is too late, to free the nation and ourselves of the scourge of the likes of the Obamas and Clintons. If we do not do it now, then all is likely to be lost.
STATE DEPARTMENT SACRIFICES CHILDREN FOR ‘GAY’ IMPERIALISM - By
LINDA HARVEY - Should the
U.S. State Department receive grants from private foundations promoting
homosexuality? There’s something wrong with this picture, along with the State
Department’s obsession with global homosexual “rights.” But even more alarming
is the callous treatment of children along the way.
...The State Department has a program called the Global Equality Fund. Launched in December 2011 by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the focus is to support questionable lifestyles as part of U.S. foreign policy: "The Department of State is working to advance the human rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) people as part of our comprehensive human rights policy and as a priority of our foreign policy."
This fund accepts grants and donations, one as large as $1 million from the Arcus Foundation in 2012 . Maybe it’s just me, but this seems very odd. Should private groups be paying for U.S. foreign policy influence? This is lobbying, right? However, the Arcus grant is just one of many “public-private partnerships“ at the Department of State.
But the stranger-than-fiction saga doesn’t end there. The executive director of Arcus since 2012 is a name familiar to many of us, none other Kevin Jennings, founder of the child-targeting Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). After his short dance through the Obama Department of Education as “safe schools” czar, he fled once he was outed as a radical largely responsible for the depraved agenda of GLSEN and its propagation of pro-homosexual clubs and programs in U.S. schools. Jennings is now executive director of Arcus, responsible for disseminating millions each year, largely to homosexual groups. And never forget what has become the main goal of homosexual activism today: to allege a clear “cause-effect” connection between traditional moral viewpoints and violence. The shoe never fits and such claims are akin to fascism, but Jennings developed this narrative at GLSEN and will keep selling it across the globe, including within Russia and the Ukraine.
Arcus under Jennings has joined with the Open Society Institute (George Soros) to launch the Russia Freedom Fund, all about “LGBT” rights; that’s their story and they’re sticking to it. Interviewed following the Sochi Olympics, Jennings touted the high visibility of the Russian homosexual “rights” issue (with funding from Arcus) prior to the event. Arcus Foundation is the Kalamazoo, Michigan non-profit arm connected to the Stryker medical device manufacturer. Jon Stryker, the heir of the corporation, is an open homosexual.
One of the goals of Arcus has been to support homosexuality in religious groups, mostly Christian– in other words, the funding of division, destruction and heresy. They’ve contributed over $10 million toward that end since the 1970s. One of the global groups working to undermine morality in the countries of Uganda, France, Brazil, Russia and others is All Out. With funding from Arcus, the Gill Foundation, the Ford Foundation and others, All Out helped fuel the frenzy in Russia leading up to the Olympics following passage of its ban on the promotion of homosexuality to children, and All Out is one of the groups behind the hysteria that falsely labeled a proposed law in Uganda, the “Kill the Gays” bill.
...Sexual Minorities of Uganda (SMUG) partners with “gay” youth organizations and advocates for the “rights” of minors to be homosexual, which sometimes means (as parents rightly fear) the empowerment of children to accept the advances of homosexual adults without criminal penalties for the adults. Meanwhile, despite several Western countries cutting aid to Uganda, the country is prospering financially. So essentially, Arcus, Gill, Soros et. al. are funding bullying programs to intimidate and smear people into toeing the line on the “human right” of sodomy. And children are often the victims. And let’s not forget the U.S. State Department’s role in this chilling distortion of “human rights.” Hillary Clinton put massive pressure on the Uganda government to drop their homosexuality bill. How dare she have so little concern about kids?
o The only reason that people like Hillary Clinton is “her gender”. (Rush Limbaugh) Almost everybody that supports her can’t name a single accomplishment that she has, but they think having a woman president would be a great sign of progress.
Hillary Clinton Turns to Jesus to Promote the Welfare State - By Gary
DeMar - Liberals love the Bible when they can turn it into Silly Putty. They
can find support for every leftist doctrine as long as they skip words, read
verses out of context, and read their own views into specific texts. Even the
Devil quoted the Bible (Matt. 4:1-11; Luke 4:1-13), so we shouldn’t be surprised
if we encounter politicians peddling the Devil’s wares also doing it. Speaking
before the United
Methodist Women’s Assembly, Hillary Clinton naturally appealed to the Bible
in support of her expansive view of the State. There are enough religiously
misinformed people in America that will believe almost anything a politician
says if it is wrapped in blanket of compassion and care for others. How can
anybody be against helping people? Jesus helped people. Therefore if you do not
want to help people, then you are against the teachings of Jesus.
...Of course, while she’s staking her claims on contextually suspect passages, no one seems to care how theologically schizophrenic she us. The same United Methodists that embrace Hillary’s appeal to the Bible on Jesus’ feeding the 5000 don’t find a contradiction in her support of abortion and same-sex marriage because they are equally theologically schizophrenic.
...“Clinton said she struggled as a young woman between her father's insistence on self-reliance and her mother's concern for compassion. She reconciled those in the Biblical story of Jesus instructing his disciples to feed 5,000 people with just five loaves of bread and two fish. “‘The disciples come to Jesus and suggest they send away the people to find food to fend for themselves. But Jesus said, “No. You feed them,”’” Clinton said. ‘He was teaching a lesson about the responsibility we all share.’"
This story, found in the 14th chapter of Matthew’s gospel, is hardly a recipe for economic equality. It was one meal, and it was a miracle. Jesus the feeder of 5000 men (not counting women and children) also said that “man does not live by bread alone” (Matt. 4:4; Deut. 8:3). The same schools that provide "free" breakfast and lunches to poor school children using other people’s money prohibits the other type of feeding that Jesus required, that is, “every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God” (Matt. 4:4b).
The liberal State actually believes it can do miracles, and it doesn’t need any loaves of bread or fish to perform them. All it used to need was a printing press, cotton and linen sheets of paper, and barrels of ink. Today, the State only needs a few key strokes to turn the equivalent of “stones into bread” (Matt. 4:3-4). Hillary failed to mention the crowd response to Jesus’ feeding so many with so little. We have to pick up the story in John’s gospel: “Therefore when the people saw the sign which He had performed, they said, ‘This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world.’ So Jesus, perceiving that they were intending to come and take Him by force to make Him king, withdrew again to the mountain by Himself alone” (John 6:14-15).
The crowd’s reaction to Jesus’ miracle is exactly what Hillary and other liberals want. But instead of withdrawing from the people, they desire to embrace them with promises they cannot keep in order to make them dependent on the State forever.
“Looking to the state for sustenance is a cultic act [an act of worship]; we rightly learn to expect food from parents, and when we regard the state as the source of physical provision we render to it the obeisance of idolatry. The crowds who had fed on the multiplied loaves and fishes were ready to receive Christ as their ruler, not because of who he was but because of the provision. John Howard Yoder has rightly interpreted that scene: ‘The distribution of bread moved the crowd to acclaim Jesus as the new Moses, the provider, the Welfare King whom they had been waiting for.’” ...Politicians like Hillary Clinton pick up on the desire for security and dependency from the masses and use them for political gain: “The idol state uses the language of compassion because its intention is a messianic one. It finds the masses harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd, needing a savior.”
As Clintons Threaten Return to The White House, a Walk Down Memory Lane: a
Laundry List of Their Many Scandals … by J.D.
Longstreet - Lest we forget the sheer torment of the chain of scandals
during the Clinton Years: Below is a list of the Bill Clinton scandals and his
legacy: (Compiled by
...Whitewater ...Cattle Futuresgate ...Travelgate ...Gennifer Flowersgate ...Filegate ...Vince Fostergate
...Whitewater Billing Recordsgate ...Paula Jonesgate ...Federal Building Campaign Phone Callsgate ...Lincoln Bedroomgate
...Donations from Convicted Drug and Weapons Dealersgate ...Buddhist Templegate ...Lippogate ...Chinagate
...The Lewinsky Affair ...Perjury and Jobs for Lewinskygate ...Willeygate ...Web Hubbell Prison Phone Callgate
...Selling Military Technology to the Chinesegate ...Wag the Doggate ...Jaunita Broaddrick Gate
...Vandalgate ...Lootergate ...Pardongate (See column link for details on eah scandal.)
... If that list is not enough for you just type “List of Clinton Scandals” into Google. You might want to grab a snack prior to hitting the search button though. Also — consider this from American Thinker: “For as long as Hillary Clinton has been on the national scene, she has left a path of destruction and wreckage in her wake that is both impressive and terrible to behold. She is a testament to the extent of damage that can be done by one person determined to conquer everything before her in the quest for unlimited power and self-gratification. The only prize left to her in American politics is the presidency, which she has always felt is hers by right. Indeed, she would have attained it were it not for the upstart community organizer, a fellow admirer of Saul Alinsky, who spoke in volumes but said nothing.” (See also: More crimes committed by Hillary and the skeletons in her closet)
o DNC Members Can't Think of Single Hillary Achievement (Video 4m12s)
Hillary’s Sugar Daddy Socialism Is Fair Game By
Kurt Schlichte -
Here’s the cold, hard truth: If Hillary hadn’t kept her part of the bargain with
Bill Clinton by putting up with his serial abuse, she’d be just another grim
liberal matron scowling at the thought that somewhere, out there, a man isn’t
apologizing. Liberal feminism was always about the liberalism, never about the
female. Like every liberal pose, it is based upon a lie. Women, to liberal
feminists like Hillary, are simply a means to an end. Hillary’s end was personal
power, and all she had to do was destroy the occasional Paula Jones or Kathleen
Willey if they protested being her hubby’s glorified sex toys. We aren’t
supposed to talk about how liberal feminism messed up our culture for women who
aren’t married to a rich former president, and we aren’t supposed to mention
that Hillary embodies liberal feminism better than almost anything except Ted
...No, we’re not supposed to comment on how Hillary has accomplished absolutely nothing by herself, except Benghazi. Wanna see a liberal squirm? Ask him to name Hillary’s greatest success as Secretary of State. You’ll get: “Uh, she raised awareness of women’s issues around the world.” Apparently, until she dumped a zillion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere jetting around from “Reset” fiasco to Arab Spring disaster, the world was unaware of women. As Secretary of State, foreign potentates understood her as a mere flunky. But if the American people elect this empty pantsuit president, how will they treat her? They know Bill used her like a doormat. They will too. Why would anyone have any respect for her – or fear of her? You won’t hear that from the slobbering sycophants of solidarity in the mainstream media. After all, when it comes to protecting Hillary’s façade of accomplishment, it takes a Potemkin Village. Wait, can we say that?
Krauthammer: Antagonizing Canada is Hillary’s Only Achievement as Secretary of
State By Leah
Barkoukis - Hillary Clinton is undoubtedly the Democratic frontrunner, a
point Charles Krauthammer conceded on the Hugh
Hewitt show Tuesday, but if any Democrat wants to challenge her, he thinks
the place to start would be with her abysmal record as secretary of state. “With
these fiascos underway in Kiev, a massacre, and in Venezuela, the arrest of
opposition leader, Leopoldo Lopez today, Hillary’s foreign policy trifecta is
complete,” Hewitt said. “She’s lost South America, she’s lost the Middle East,
and she’s lost Eastern Europe. How does anyone recover from that and run for the
“When people talk about Hillary being a superb secretary of State, I just ask one question,” Krauthammer replied. “Name me one thing, just one, not three, give me one thing she achieved in her four years as secretary of state. I have yet to hear an answer.” Clinton has of course traveled a lot, but that doesn’t make her qualified to be president, he added.
“I think she is the frontrunner. I don’t think the convention will be a coronation. It’s going to be a worship service. But that’s not exactly why we have a secretary of state,” Krauthammer said. “I do think it’s really awful that you can have a four year term, achieve nothing, and as you say, go backwards with Russia, backwards on Iran, backwards on Syria, backwards on Venezuela, backwards in relation with just about all of our allies, including, I would add, Keystone, which sits on the President’s head, and antagonizing Canada, for God’s sake. Canada, of all people, that’s quite an achievement when you can antagonize Canada. That’s not easy to do. And to get them upset, which is never happened in about 100 years, I mean, this is foreign policy of failure. And the only reason people haven’t focused on it is because there’s been so much failure at home that it’s overshadowed what’s happening abroad.”
o CBS News Exposes The Lies of Hillary Clinton - The Lies & Unethical Behavior of a Serial Killer. CBS news exposes the real story of Hillary Clintons 1996 trip to Bosnia.
o THE CLINTON BODY
BAGS (Real Verse) - Just a quick
refresher course lest we forget what has happened to many “friends” of the vile
1- James McDougal – Clintons convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.
2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown .. The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.
3 – Vince Foster – Former White House councilor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.
4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors. The rest of the people on the plane also died. A few days later the air Traffic controller commited suicide.
5 – C. Victor Raiser, II – Raiser, a major player in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.
6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock , September 1992. Described by Clinton as a “dear friend and trusted advisor”.
7 – Ed Willey – Clinton fundraiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.
8 – Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock .. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.
9 – James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas
10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater..
11 – Kathy Ferguson – Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.
12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee.
13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.
14 – Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal, Mena, Arkansas, airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds.
15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.
16 – Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.
17 – Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter. Investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.
18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993, in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death.
19 – Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington , Virginia apartment balcony August 15, 1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guaranty scandal.
20 – Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.
21 – Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.
22 – Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton ‘s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.
23 – Barry Seal – Drug running TWA pilot out of Mena Arkansas, death was no accident.
24 – Johnny Lawhorn, Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole.
25 – Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guaranty. His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released.
26 – Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fundraiser died March 1, 1994, when his plane exploded.
27 – Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks. Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.
THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES – HENRY CASE:
28 – Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, 7/88.
29 – Keith McMaskle – Died, stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988
30 – Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.
31 – Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.
3 2 – James Milan – Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to natural causes”.
33 – Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.
34 – Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives/Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.
THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD:
36 – Major William S. Barkley, Jr.
37 – Captain Scott J . Reynolds
38 – Sgt. Brian Hanley
39 – Sgt. Tim Sabel
40 – Major General William Robertson
41 – Col. William Densberger
42 – Col. Robert Kelly
43 – Spec. Gary Rhodes
44 – Steve Willis
45 – Robert Williams
46 – Conway LeBleu
47 – Todd McKeehan
o Hilary Clinton’s Foreign Policy Blunder of Historic Proportions (MichaelYoussef.com ) - It is easy to question Hillary Clinton’s competence during her tenure as Secretary of State. U.S. relations with Russia have deteriorated, Iran and North Korea have not been restrained, and Syria has fallen into chaos. And as far as blunders go, it’s hard to compete with her revealing congressional testimony about the reason for the Benghazi attack, during which she heartlessly asked, “What difference does it make?” But her greatest blunder was failing to recognize the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt for what it was: a terror organization. The Muslim Brotherhood is just like its kissing cousin, Hamas. Their definition of democracy is: one man, one vote, one time. After the first election, you’ll never see another. Clinton’s unbridled support for the Brotherhood leader and now-disgraced former Egyptian President, Mohamed Morsi, was inexcusable. A freshman in Foreign Policy 101 would have seen through the charade that led to her historic miscalculation.
Welcome to the Presidential Race, Hillary By
Emmett Tyrrell - It
is happening again. The media tell us there is a huge groundswell of support for
Hillary to run for the presidency in 2016. Already an enormous political action
committee has been formed. She is again -- as she was in 2008 -- the Inevitable
Candidate and, by the way, the Inevitable President. Moreover, the mainstream
media are, of course, with her.
These are what I have been calling for over 20 years the media's Episodic Apologists. Their professional lives have followed a well-worn arc since at least 1992 when the Clintons first emerged nationally -- though the arc was there in Arkansas back in the 1980s. At first, the Episodic Apologists are full of hope for the Clintons -- they have such charisma, such political promise. Then, splat, they fall headlong into a scandal of their own making -- Troopergate, Travelgate, Monicagate, Impeachment, or their incomparable exit from the White House. Of a sudden, the Episodic Apologists fall into darkest despair. "How could they? They had it all," and The Episodic Apologists' funk continues.
...Maintained by Hillary's Arkansas friend, Diane Blair, who passed away in 2000, the documents include diary entries, letters and memos of conversations with Hillary from her embattled White House. They are candid. They include Hillary's insight that the journalists -- the Episodic Apologists? -- have "big egos and no brains." Her overbearing mentality, "I'm used to winning and I intend to win on my own terms." And her attempts to deal with perceived enemies. For instance, she discussed with Blair the need to depict Gennifer Flowers, Bill's on-again off-again mistress of 12 years, as a "fraud, liar and possible criminal to stop this story and related stories." As for Monica Lewinsky, Hillary described her as a clever bully who seduced her helpless husband. Monica was 22, Bill 49 and president of the United States of America. Writes Blair, "It was a lapse, but she [Hillary] says to his credit he [Bill] tried to break it off, tried to pull away, tried to manage someone who was clearly a 'narcissistic loony toon'; but it was beyond control." Incidentally, in attempting to "break it off" Bill had telephone sex with Lewinsky some 15 times, often after 10:00 p.m.
o Should 'Ruthless' Clinton Be
President? (PatriotPost.us) - This week's Washington
Free Beacon report on the so-called Hillary papers created quite a stir
about the presumptive 2016 Democrat presidential nominee. The Leftmedia would
rather not report on the papers at all, and they in fact didn't for four years.
The papers, notes based on conversations with Clinton by longtime friend Diane
Blair, were actually made public in 2010. But the Free Beacon story shouldn't be
ignored, so now the Leftmedia is circling the wagons around their once and
future queen, attempting to frame the story as trash coming from a right-wing
chop shop pursuing an “anti-Clinton” agenda.
The papers reveal quite a bit about Clinton's psyche and her ruthlessly ambitious personality, but more importantly they resurrect a number of issues worthy of debate. Clinton has spent most of her political career as a shoo-in for the presidency, so long that it seems that few people have actually done a hard examination of just what exactly makes her fit for the office. It's not HillaryCare, which was an epic failure in 1993, made more plain by the fact that we're living with the wreckage that ObamaCare has created. It's not her time as senator from New York, an unremarkable term that was nothing more than a transparent attempt to position her for a 2008 presidential run. And it's certainly not her role as secretary of state, which figures largely in America's severely diminished role as a world leader and will ultimately be remembered for the still-unfolding Benghazi scandal.
But in the end, to borrow a phrase, what difference does all this make? Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus noted that if Hillary Clinton runs in 2016, “everything's on the table.” As it should be. Clinton inserted herself into the public debate from the very launch of her husband's 1992 presidential campaign. Neither she nor her acolytes should expect her to get a pass on anything, though they will attempt to dismiss it all as part of an “anti-Clinton” agenda – or a “vast right-wing conspiracy,” if you will. But maybe, just maybe, people will be able to look at Hillary Clinton's long political journey and realize that there is nothing there that makes the case for her being president of the United States.
o Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters - Full (YouTube 1h32m16s)
o Bill & Hillary Clinton: Their Secret Life - #01 of 12 (YouTube 9m24s) - This documentary, entitled Bill Clinton: His Life, came out in 2004, right about the same time as the autobiography, Bill Clinton: My Life. It takes a good, hard look at the dirty dealings of both Bill and Hillary Clinton but, for some reason never achieved the popularity of Michael Moore's fantasy film, Fahrenheit 911. This movie has been thoroughly suppressed by our left-wing media to the point that it's not listed on IMDb, nor can you find anything about it through a Google search. Hopefully that will change now that it's been made available on YouTube. Watch and learn how the Clintons turned the White House into a headquarters for organized crime, communist spying and murder, all while the Clinton-friendly media kept the public distracted by focusing on a few of Slick Willy's petty sexual encounters.
o Rand Paul Destroys Hillary Clinton Over Benghazi-Gate During Capitol Hill Press (YouTube 6m13s)
o SHOCKING VIDEO OF HILLARY CLINTON! ( Hillary Uncensored - YouTube 5m57s) Hillary caught on camera breaking the law. Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Then, there's the Clintons... This is the video that's been buzzing around the blogs for the past few months, becoming one of the most viewed on Google Video. It shows the Peter Paul side of the issue, which involves allegations that Hillary Clinton has committed numerous federal election law violations, has lied about them to cover them up, all culminating in what might be felonious conduct on her part. Paul makes a strong case here. This is the most shocking expose on the blatant corruption surrounding Hillary Clinton. Includes exclusive home videos of Hillary to expose the illegalities that elected Hillary to the Senate and the obstructions of justice that keep her there.
Hillary Clinton ‘certainly aware’ of security problems before Benghazi: report
By Stephen Dinan
- House Republicans on Friday issued a new report that says former Secretary of
Rodham Clinton “was certainly aware” of security problems in Libya ahead
of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi.
The new report also questions the validity of the State Department’s own internal review, known as the Accountability Review Board, saying it had serious deficiencies. The Obama administration has pointed to that ARB review in arguing that blame for the attack lies with lower-level employees and doesn’t reach as high as Mrs. Clinton, but the report by Republicans on the House Foreign Affairs Committee says she should have been held accountable.
The report also faults her and her successor, Secretary John F. Kerry, for failing to fire anyone for the security breaches that left four Americans, including the ambassador to Libya, dead.
“Systemic failures at the State Department during Secretary Clinton’s tenure resulted in a grossly inadequate security posture in Benghazi,” the report concludes. “These vulnerabilities contributed to the deaths of four Americans, including the first U.S. ambassador killed in the line of duty since 1979.” The report points to Mrs. Clinton’s own testimony that she was aware of the security concerns in Benghazi — though other reviews have said she was never made aware of the specifics, including some of the requests for additional security or military protection that were denied.
o Hillary's Resumé (PatriotPost.us) - Lanny Davis, former counsel for Bill Clinton, was asked by radio host Hugh Hewitt to name some of Hillary Clinton's accomplishments during her stint as secretary of state. Clinton, after all, appears positioned to cruise to the Democrat nomination in 2016. The problem is that Davis couldn't name any accomplishments. “Well, the biggest thing of all is goodwill around the world, which is what secretaries of state do.” Would that include goodwill from nations like Iran and Syria thumbing their noses at us, or from al-Qaida attacking our consulate in Benghazi? To be fair to Davis, though, we can't name any of her accomplishments either.
- Hillary voted for and supports huge budget deficits that is bankrupting our
- Hillary supports Bill Clinton's gun ban legislation, banning assault weapons and creating a national gun registry;
- Hillary supports amnesty for illegal immigrants
- Hillary has supported higher taxes on virtually every segment of society justifying them by saying, "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good";
- Hillary supports forcing workers to join unions as a condition of their employment; and
- Hillary supports taxpayer funding of abortions and also supports the most horrific late term abortions.
Hillary’s Top 7 Elitist Moments by BEN
SHAPIRO - Throughout, there was one abiding feature that kept cropping up
for the would-be president: she has nothing in common with the common man. Here,
then, are her top seven other out-of-touch moments: (Click link for details of
7. The Military Uniform Ban. ...
...6. Gas Station Indians. ...
...5. Allegedly Forcing Secret Service to Carry Her Bags. ...
...4. Abusing an Electrician. ...
...3. Not Exactly Showing Sympathy for the Homeless. ...
...2. Talking to Eleanor Roosevelt…But Not Jesus. ...
...1. “What Difference…Does It Make?” ...
Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis By James
Simpson - One of two things must be true. Either the Democrats are
unfathomable idiots, who ignorantly pursue ever more destructive policies
despite decades of contrary evidence, or they understand the consequences of
their actions and relentlessly carry on anyway because they somehow benefit. I
submit to you they understand the consequences. For many it is simply a
practical matter of eliciting votes from a targeted constituency at taxpayer
expense; we lose a little, they gain a lot, and the politician keeps his job.
But for others, the goal is more malevolent - the failure is deliberate. Don't
laugh. This method not only has its proponents, it has a name: the Cloward-Piven
Strategy. It describes their agenda, tactics, and long-term strategy.
The Strategy was first elucidated in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation magazine by a pair of radical socialist Columbia University professors, Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. David Horowitz summarizes it as: The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.
Cloward and Piven were inspired by radical organizer [and Hillary Clinton mentor] Saul Alinsky: "Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules," Alinsky wrote in his 1989 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one. (Courtesy Discover the Networks.org)
Newsmax rounds out the picture: Their strategy to create political, financial, and social chaos that would result in revolution blended Alinsky concepts with their more aggressive efforts at bringing about a change in U.S. government. To achieve their revolutionary change, Cloward and Piven sought to use a cadre of aggressive organizers assisted by friendly news media to force a re-distribution of the nation's wealth.
Lives By John Hayward, HumanEvents.com - The media congratulates Barack
Obama and Hillary Clinton for successfully deceiving them. ...It’s also amusing
that NBC thinks its readers will believe Benghazi ever had anything remotely
close to the intensity or tenor of the coverage afforded to Bridgegate.
Benghazi was never a 24-hour carnival of skepticism, in which everything the
Administration said was treated as dubious and investigated like crazy.
Reporters were not floating theories about how the climate of falsehood and
negligence created by the leadership of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton was
worthy of condemnation, even if no documentation proving they directly ordered
the cover-up could be found, the way they have grown obsessed with the “climate”
of the Christie administration. Evidently only Republicans can be held
accountable for producing the nasty partisan emissions that lead to such climate
...How on Earth could any sensible, informed person claim that Hillary Clinton's 20-year career somehow balances out Benghazi? On the contrary, her career is filled with evasions, the destruction of documents, cover-ups, and abuses of authority. Her tenure at the State Department produced precious little in the way of actual achievements, but a jaw-dropping number of concealed scandals. She’s spent a lifetime studying the dark art of finger-pointing, and her kung fu skills were fully in evidence when she blamed that YouTube video for the Benghazi attack and vowed to take down the video maker, right into the faces of the slain Americans’ grieving families. And the latest Benghazi revelations prove beyond all doubt that she knew she was lying when she said that. All of which is very, very, very relevant information for voters to consider when the 2016 election rolls around.
o Bias Bash: Media ignoring Hillary's very bad week? Jan. 16, 2014 - Justin Duckham on the media's failure to report that Hillary Clinton's 2016 chances may be coming apart at the seams
CONGRESSMAN KING: HILLARY BUSTED IN MONSTER 'LIE' 'I heard her with my own ears'
By GARTH KANT - Former Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton lied to the American people about Benghazi, a
congressman who recently returned from a fact-finding trip to Libya told WND.
Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa He said she also lied to Congress. Rep. Steve King,
R-Iowa, was unequivocal when WND asked him, “What makes you so certain that
Hillary Clinton lied?” “Because,” King replied, “I heard her with my own ears.”
And, what contradicted her? “The facts.” King also had a blistering response to
a famous question posed by Clinton. During a Senate committee hearing Jan. 23,
2013, when asked what caused the death of four Americans in Benghazi, Clinton
responded indignantly, “At this point, what difference does it make?” WND asked
King if he had an answer for her. “The reason it makes a difference, Hillary
Clinton, is because this administration lied to the American people. Her voice
was one of those voices that lied to the American people.”
The congressman related how Clinton and other administration officials were dishonest when they briefed Congress within a week of the terrorist attack at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, in which U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, computer specialist Sean Smith and CIA security contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were killed. King said he could not divulge what was said during a classified briefing he attended, but, “I will just tell you that the administration’s officials told the same lies to members of Congress in a classified setting that they told the public five times on Sunday.” He was referring to appearances on five political talk shows by then-Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice on Sept. 16, 2012, during which she claimed the attack was a spontaneous protest inspired by anger over an obscure anti-Muslim video on the Internet. “We know that’s false,” King told WND. “On top of that, we know they knew it was false. They knew within three hours that it was a calculated, strategized attack by an organized enemy on that compound and that annex in Benghazi.” Strong confirmation of King’s version of events has just come to light, as newly declassified documents show top defense officials briefed Obama that a terrorist attack was underway in Benghazi not long after it began.
7 Reasons Hillary Would Make a Terrible President By
7 – You Mean a Lawmaker is Supposed to Pass Bills? - As a U.S. Senator Hillary accomplished exactly nothing. Not a single piece of landmark legislation to her name.
6 – First Lady Fail - Hillary’s health care plan bombed so bad it cost the Democrats control of Congress, including control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years.
5 – Scandalmania - Many of the Clinton era scandals in the 90’s – including the opening up of 900 confidential FBI files of political opponents – cast Hillary in a suspicious light. Nothing was proven, but you know how that goes.
4 – Playing Political Games With Foreign Policy - Hillary Clinton admitted her opposition to the troop surge in Iraq was politically motivated because she knew she would be facing Barack Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary.
3 – Hillary Aide’s Special Treatment - Huma Abedin, a “top adviser” to Hillary Clinton at the State Department (and wife of Anthony Weiner), was given a special arrangement that allowed her to earn money from a corporation formed by a Bill Clinton aide, and allowed her to serve in a role with the Clinton Foundation while she was a federal employee.Conveniently, Huma forgot to disclose the arrangement on the State Department financial disclosure forms. Oops.
2 – Hillary Was Fired During The Watergate Investigation - Hillary was fired for her work during the Watergate investigation. As her supervisor at the time put it, “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
1 – Benghazi: Four Americans Dead on Hillary’s Watch - Under her reign as Secretary of State Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were murdered when terrorists stormed the American compound in Benghazi, Libya. When she was questioned about the Obama Administration’s initial story that the attack was provoked by an anti-Islam YouTube video, Clinton callously blurted, “What difference, at this point, does it make?” Really!?
Coercing Conformity A government that creates the climate for bullying is
the worst of the bullies. - By Andrew
C. McCarthy - In “protecting the rights of all people to worship the way
they choose,” then–secretary of state Hillary Clinton vowed “to
use some old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming, so that people
don’t feel that they have the support to do what we abhor.” Mrs. Clinton
required translation into the language of truth, as she generally does when her
lips are moving. By the “rights” of “all people” to “worship” as “they choose,”
she meant the sharia-based desire of Muslim supremacists to foreclose critical
examination of Islam. Madame Secretary, you see, was speechifying before her
friends at the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) — the bloc of 56 Muslim
countries plus the Palestinian territories.
At that very moment in July 2011, Christians were under siege in Egypt, Syria, Sudan, Iraq, and Iran — being gradually purged from those Islamic countries just as they’d been purged from Turkey, which hosted Mrs. Clinton’s speech. As Christians from the Middle East to West Monroe, La., can tell you, the Left and its Obama vanguard are not remotely interested in their “rights . . . to worship the way they choose.”
What they choose, after all, is to honor Christian tenets about sexuality, freedom of conscience, and the sanctity of life. Those tenets, just like honest criticism of Islam, are consigned to the category Clinton calls “what we abhor.” And if progressives abhor something, it somehow always becomes everyone’s duty to make certain that those who embrace that something “don’t feel that they have . . . support.”
Of course, they do have support . . . at least on paper. The First Amendment protects all of us against government suppression of speech. But the amendment is just a parchment promise if the government against which it is a safeguard actively undermines it. That is today’s United States government: rendering free expression an illusory right by inciting the mob, by extortionate lawfare tactics that exhaust the resources and energy of the citizen.
o Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters - Full (1:30:17) The 2nd "savior" of "we the sheeple"
Will Hillary’s 2016 Bid End Once America Learns Of Her Treasonous Dealings
Muslim Sisterhood? by Dave
Jolly - A month ago I reported that Egyptian lawyers had filed charges
of criminal treason and crimes against humanity against President Barack Obama for
his involvement and support of the Muslim Brotherhood. However, there has
not been one peep from the mainstream media about the charges which could see
Obama drug into international court. They have conveniently protected
their socialist savior from the reports.
Now, reports from Egypt are connecting then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to domestic terrorism that took place in Egypt under the Muslim Brotherhood. In an interview with Turkey’s Anatolia news agency, Naglaa Mahmoud, the wife of ousted Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, she admitted her role in the nation’s violence. She told them that she actively worked to help excite domestic insurrections to overthrown Abdel Fatah Al Sisi, the new Deputy Prime Minister of Egypt. Perhaps the most internationally explosive part of her interview was when she said that her actions were in collaboration with Hillary Clinton. Former Muslim Brotherhood activist turned Christian, Walid Shoebat translated part of the interview with Mahmoud. What she said should shock you and should be enough to dash any 2016 presidential hopes of Hillary Clinton, but you know that the liberal mainstream media will keep this buried just as they have buried the news about the charges filed against Obama:
Qaffas: According to Anatolia Press, Mahmoud said, “I have between my fingers, a treasure trove of secrets from the White House and Mrs. Clinton fears my wrath.”She said, “I will not speak about Huma Abedin”. When asked if she had a close relationship with Hillary Clinton, Mahmoud said, “When my husband returns from his kidnapping, the one who led the coup will pay a hefty price.” Of Mrs. Clinton, she said, “We have a long friendship of many years. We lived in the U.S. and my children learned there. This friendship increased further when my husband became the legitimate president of the country.” Mahmoud went on to say that they were recruited by the Clintons from the U.S. and began their friendship in the 1980′s. This appears to be a conspiracy that is being hidden.
When asked if they still have friendships with each other, Mahmoud said communications never ceased and that the conversations are all recorded. The wife of Mursi divulged that Mrs. Clinton seeks the assistance – both official and unofficial – of several members of the Muslim Sisterhood organization to help with problems in the Middle East. “We also have routine business dealings with the Clintons.” Mahmoud further stated that “Hillary depends on us tremendously to help her succeed in the coming presidential elections, just as we helped Barack Obama win twice.” She is quite the looney bin to believe she helped Obama win.
o It Would Be A Hillary-ous Tragedy - Are you ready for Hillary in 2016? … Neither is Zo. He explains how backwards it is that feminists would support a woman who stood by her adulterous, chauvinistic, husband. He issues a very strong warning to the GOP: Find out on ZoNation!
o Frank Aquila - Short Quiz - COMMUNISM IS CREEPING IN ONE STEP AT A TIME, EXACTLY AS PLANNED.
Six trivia questions to see how much history you know. Be honest, it's kinda fun and revealing. If you don't know the answer make your best guess. Answer all the questions (no cheating) before looking at the answers.
Who said it?
1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
A. Karl Marx
B. Adolph Hitler
C. Joseph Stalin
D. None of the above
2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few...... And to replace it with shared responsibility,,,,,for shared prosperity."
C. Idi Amin
D. None of the Above
3) "(We) .....can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."
A. Nikita Khrushev
B. Josef Goebbels
C. Boris Yeltsin
D. None of the above
4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own ... in order to create this common ground."
A. Mao Tse Dung
B. Hugo Chavez
C. Kim Jong Il
D. None of the above
5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed."
A. Karl Marx
D. None of the above
6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched."
C. Saddam Hussein
D. None of the above
Scroll down for answers
(1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/29/2004
(2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 5/29/2007
(3) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 9/2/2005
Wanna know something scary? She may be the next socialist president if you don't forward this to everyone that you know.
Hillary's Thesis: The Village Has to Have an Enemy by Amanda B. Carpenter - Hillary Clinton's political methods were founded on the theories of a 1960s radical about whom she wrote her college thesis in 1969. It may take a village to raise a child, but Clinton's college thesis seems to say that the village politicos need an enemy to mobilize against.
<--- Click on this PatriotPost.us Political Cartoon (Hillary is inviting you to her "Village.")
"It's the ultimate nightmare scenario for conservatives: to awaken on the morning of Nov. 5, 2008, to the news that the last swing state has been colored bright blue and Hillary Rodham Clinton is the president—elect of the United States." John Podhoretz, conservative commentator and former Reagan and George H.W. Bush speechwriter.
Reading between the lines of Hillary's "I'm in" announcement Edward Daley
The Hillary factor Cal Thomas -“Sen. Clinton ticked off the issues about which she is ticked off, because she says the Bush administration has failed to deal with them. They include health care, Social Security, Medicare and Iraq. The Bush administration has attempted to address all of these, but Democrats have blocked any progress. It’s an old political trick. You work against success and then blame failure on the president.”
“The most fundamental difference between President Bush and his critics has not been in who has made mistakes, because both have. The biggest difference has been that the President has taken a long-run view of the worldwide war on terror, while his critics are seeking a quick fix. Critics claim that there is no connection between the war on terror and the war in Iraq. They don’t seem to notice that the terrorists themselves obviously see a clear connection, which they express in both words and deeds. Terrorists are pouring into Iraq, even at the cost of their lives, in order to prevent a free, democratic government from being established in the Middle East. They see victory or defeat in Iraq as having major and long-lasting repercussions throughout the region and even throughout the world.” Thomas Sowell - Another Vietnam Part II
I AM WOMAN, HEAR ME BORE - By Ann Coulter - Legal Affairs Correspondent, Human Events - It's nice to have a president who is not so sleazy that not a single Supreme Court justice shows up for his State of the Union address (Bill Clinton, January 1999, when eight justices stayed away to protest Clinton's disregard for the law and David Souter skipped the speech to watch "Sex and the City"). Speaking of which, the horny hick's wife finally ended the breathless anticipation by announcing that she is running for president. I studied tapes of Hillary feigning surprise at hearing about Monica to help me look surprised upon learning that she's running.
Hillary Clinton's Flip-Flop Chronicled (NewsMax.com)The lead editorial in Thursday’s Wall Street Journal chronicles Sen. Hillary Clinton’s move from a "solid, even eloquent hawk” on the Iraq war to a presidential candidate calling for a quick withdrawal of American forces.
Hillary Clinton, on June 3, 2004 said: "I have known George Soros for a long time now... We need people like George Soros, who is fearless, and willing to step up when it counts."
Further Recommended Resources
concerning Hillary Clinton
Hillary's Global Agenda - Stop Hillary PAC - www.hillcap.org - NewsMax on Hillary -
December 2005 - The Hillary Clinton Accountability Project is a project of the United States Justice Foundation intended to educate the public about the largest federal election campaign fraud ever reported. Through its representation of whistleblower Peter Paul in his ongoing landmark court case, Paul vs. Hillary Rodham Clinton, William Jefferson Clinton, et al., the USJF will uncover in court and expose evidence linking Senator Hillary Clinton and then-President Bill Clinton with orchestrating a multi-million-dollar fraud against Paul, the Federal Election Commission and other Federal agencies, as well as the voters of New York, in connection with her 2000 election to the U.S. Senate.
Hillary's Agenda: To prevent an uproar and from being to obvious, deceptively and slowly take away our individual rights, one at a time, your parental rights, your freedoms, relinquish America's Constitution and sovereignty, and replace it for the United Nations Charter of a One World Government - the New world Order of an UNELECTED Security Council. Listen closely to what she says, her Hollywood-Leftist-Like attacks on President Bush and America as a Nation. He that has ears to hear, let him hear.
"I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigrants. ...[I favor] at least a visa ID, some kind of entry-and-exit ID. And...perhaps, although I'm not a big fan of it, we might have to move towards an ID system even for citizens." Hillary Rodham Clinton
"'Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you,' Senator Hilary Clinton said... 'We're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.'" — Senator Hillary Clinton at a Democratic fundraiser as quoted in the Associated Press; June 29, 2004
Hillary: We'll take your money for 'common good' Senator speaks to wealthy taxpayers at San Francisco fund-raiser Posted: June 29, 2004 5:00 p.m. Eastern © 2004 WorldNetDaily.com - Addressing a Democratic fund-raiser yesterday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., told wealthy supporters the government will need to take money away from them for the "common good." Clinton headlined an appearance with other women Democratic senators in San Francisco, where donors gave as much as $10,000 to California Sen. Barbara Boxer's campaign. "Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Clinton said, according to the Associated Press. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Republican National Committee spokeswoman Christine Iverson told WorldNetDaily that Americans should take careful note of Clinton's remarks. "This is John Kerry's Democratic party," she said. "Small-business owners and taxpayers all across America should be very, very concerned." Kerry and Clinton, Iverson said, are people who "believe the government knows how to spend your own money better than you do." Iverson acknowledged Clinton's use of the term "common good" was telling, evoking the language of Karl Marx, who envisioned a society that distributes wealth "from each according to ability, to each according to need." In her book, "Hell to Pay: The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton," the late author Barbara Olson wrote, in Clinton's "formative years, Marxism was a very important part of her ideology." Olson described the senator growing up as a "budding Leninist" who "understood the Leninist concept of acquiring, accumulating and maintaining political power at any cost." The Washington, D.C.-based Americans for Tax Reform responded to Clinton's remarks, saying, "When it comes to tax policy, liberal politicians often try to hide their true colors." "There you have it: Hillary Clinton, the soul of the Democratic Party, talking about taxpayers’ money like it's hers," said Americans for Tax Reform head Grover Norquist. "What insufferable arrogance – it's as though our taxes are hers to spend!"
Hillary Clinton and Socialism’s “Common Good” Path to Communism in America By Jan Ireland
There could be more behind Senator Hillary Clinton's push for greater United Nations involvement in Iraq than her concern for the safety of American troops. Cliff Kincaid, director of the think tank America's Survival, charges the New York senator is not telling what is behind her strong support of the U.N. "She and her husband had given support to the World Federalist Association, a controversial organization which openly supports world government," Kincaid explains. He points out that the WFA stated in one of its documents that by adding more power, authority, and functions to the United Nations, "national sovereignty would be gradually eroded until it is no longer an issue." According to Kincaid, the WFA wants to see nationalities erased and people be designated "world citizens." A stronger involvement by the U.N. in every aspect of life would further that goal. (AgapePress.org News Breifs 12/152003)
"'Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you,' Sen. Clinton said... 'We're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.'" — Senator Hillary Clinton at a Democratic fundraiser as quoted in the Associated Press; June 29, 2004
"What Hillary and other elitists... are saying is that anyone who disagrees with them -- who adheres to limited government, the free market, traditional morality and a strong foreign policy -- just doesn’t get it. The counterpart is that people with conservative values are wicked. So, either we’re too dumb to understand how depraved our positions are, or we’re motivated by malice. The Left, on the other hand, is genius personified. Clearly, considerable brain-power went into formulating the tenets of modern liberalism: Tax increases will fuel an economic boom. Reverse discrimination furthers racial harmony. Cutting defense and a foreign policy that convinces the bin Ladens of the world that we’re a bunch of wimps is the way to keep America safe. Handouts inculcate a work ethic. Gun control -- which disarms potential victims -- is the best way to fight crime. Attacking parental authority and facilitating family dissolution helps children. Condom distribution promotes responsibility among adolescents. Not drilling in the Artic Wildlife Refuge and the virtual abandonment of nuclear power contributes to energy self-sufficiency. Brilliant!... The Left sincerely believes that ordinary Americans are imbeciles -- unfortunates who are sorely in need of a keeper (big government) to bring us in out of the rain and keep us from drooling all over ourselves." --Don Feder -- The Federalist Brief 04-20
Convicted Hollywood fundraiser Aaron Tonken, who helped organize an August 2000 star-studded tribute to Bill Clinton's presidency that doubled as a fundraiser for Hillary's Senate campaign, is writing an October-surprise tell-all book that could cause trouble for the entire Democratic Party. He has a book coming out in October in which he's promising to reveal all sorts of things," Fox News reporter Eric Shawn told WABC Radio's Monica Crowley Wednesday night. "I think we're in the beginning of what could turn out to be a major brewing story dealing with campaign financing in Mrs. Clinton's campaign." That may be an understatement, if what the New York Post's Cindy Adams says about Tonken's book turns out to be true. After getting a peek at his manuscript, Adams reports that in Chapter 13 alone there's enough material to keep a battery of Clinton damage controllers working overtime. During seven White House stays in the last three months of the Clintons' term, Tonken says, he became so cozy with the first couple that he and Hillary once sat in their pajamas together eating popcorn and watching TV in her bedroom. He also says, according to Adams, that he smoked pot with Bill's brother, Roger. When the fun and games were over, the Hollywood moneyman says, he handed out checks to "certain pols" that were "illegal." And he personally witnessed a "brown bag" stuffed with cash going "someplace it shouldn't." Tonken claims the illegal campaign contributions he personally doled out totaled over $100,000. And from the sound of the Hollywood fundraiser's statements under oath in legal proceedings against him last year, he isn't talking through his hat. "I'm a star witness against President and Mrs. Clinton," he told attorneys in an unrelated civil case. "I'm a star witness in New York in the grand jury regarding the Marc Rich pardon and regarding the fundraising activities that I've done on behalf of the Clintons." Tonken's story could impact the entire Democratic Party, since Harold Ickes, who masterminded Hillary's 2000 Senate race, is now busily raising tens of millions of dollars for the Democratic Party's presidential "Media Fund." In December, Tonken pleaded guilty to federal charges that he diverted hundreds of thousands of dollars from donors and underwriters of Hollywood events he organized. NewsMax.com
Deception + Coercion +Apathy = The Fall of America
"There are many ways to measure success; not the least of which is the way your child describes you when talking to a friend." Unknown
To begin with...
Whitewater: The land deal in Arkansas that cost US taxpayers an estimated $69 million. Cattlegate: The $100,000 return Hillary made in 1978 on a $1,000 investment in "cattle futures" in less than a year which rose concerns of a political bribe. Travelgate: When Hillary directed the firing of seven White House Travel Office workers and replace them with her friends. To justify the firings, the Clinton White House ordered the Justice Department and the IRS to initiate a criminal investigation of the fired Director. She then lied about her involvement in the firings, and the Director was acquitted by a jury of ANY wrongdoing. Filegate: The white House Security Chief, hired by Hillary, collected confidential FBI background files, a felony, on more than 1,000 Republican elected officials and former members of the Reagan and Bush Administrations.
...and continuing with...
Hate speech by Gary Aldrich (12/3/03) Having studied the Clintons up-close and personal, I have long since concluded that their politics are not the ideals of Liberals, nor are they the dreams of the naive. Instead, they matured from the radical New Left into the hateful “Hard-Left.”That people can be born and raised in this country and grow up to hate America, hate Christians because of their beliefs, hate Capitalism because some do better than others – hate President George Bush because no matter what, he continues to do the right thing and his popularity with the American people continues to grow – that there are actually those who hate George Bush enough to fly to Iraq and make a political speech criticizing the Commander-in-Chief on Thanksgiving Day is truly appalling! ... But in politics, you can reach high office, and then lie about the Commander-in-Chief during a time of war, in a foreign land, on Thanksgiving Day. You can bad-mouth President Bush to his own troops who are there and prepared to die for this country. You can do all that, and more, and not fear any consequence for your actions. What Hillary just did is the perfect way to define hate. Click here for complete article.
"At the rate our government schools are going, they'll be holding teen wedding ceremonies during recess if we're not careful. The government sure knows how to pile on the programs. Do you think it ever occurred to education policymakers that the reason we now have teen day care is because we started teaching sex education in the first place? I don't think this thought occurred to [former] First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, author of 'It Takes A Village'. Sorry Hillary --school is no substitute for a child's family. According to African tradition, the village you mention in your book refers to private citizens tending to the needs of neighbors. Sort of like being our brother's keeper. Like all good government socialists, the [former] First Lady has stretched the concept 'It takes a village to raise a child' to mean that government can usurp authority over parents." --Star Parker The Federalist Brief 03-44 Hillary wasn't being deceptive when she wrote 'It Takes A Village' was she?
"It is an inappropriate and unfortunate time for this debate to be occurring." --Sen. Ms. Hillary Rodham-Clinton-Rodham on her vote to sustain the practice of partial-birth abortions.**So, Ms. C, when would it be a "good time" to not support killing children? The Federalist Brief 03-39/40
Friend of The Federalist Bill Federer reminds us that Mother Teresa died this day, September 5, 1997. The daughter of an Albanian grocer, she joined a Catholic order at age 18 and began working in the slums of Calcutta caring for the blind, aged, lepers, crippled, and dying. A Nobel Prize recipient, 83-year-old Mother Teresa spoke at the National Prayer Breakfast in February 1994. Standing next to Bill and Hillary Clinton and Al Gore, she stated: "I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child, a direct killing of the innocent child, murder by the mother herself, and if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?" A great question -- which neither Clinton nor Gore answered. The Federalist
Berkeley economics professor J. Bradford DeLong, who worked on Hillary-Care with Hillary - "My two cents' worth -- and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994 -- is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life." The Federalist Brief 03-32
Deception + Coercion +Apathy = The Fall of America
"So you've got this President, who'd been waving his wand at everyone who walked by for their entire marriage, and he does it in the Oval Office with an intern and she says that Starr's the one obsessed with sex? Hello?" --Brit Hume on Hillary's version of the Lewinsky scandal
A man who carried the nuclear football for Bill Clinton says Americans need not be fooled by Hillary Clinton's efforts to remake herself by publishing a new book. Air Force Lt. Col. (Ret.) Buzz Patterson spent two years in the Clinton White House. In his best-selling book Dereliction of Duty, the former Air Force pilot details his first-hand experience with the presidential couple. He says people should not be fooled by Mrs. Clinton's attempted makeover. Patterson says the Mrs. Clinton he knew in the mid-1990s is not the "demure, polite, soft-spoken woman" who has been appearing on recent interviews. Instead, he describes her as someone who cannot be believed to tell the truth and an "ego-driven, sometimes vulgar and profane woman" who will stop at nothing to become the President of the United States. The author also cautions those who read her book and listen to her interviews, advising them to ask themselves what the former First Lady's real motivation might be for doing those things. AgapePress News Summary (June 12, 2003)
Based on the selected omissions of her book, Senator Hillary Clinton has proven that she is not the feminist advocate she claims to be -- or so says Pat Mahoney of the Christian Defense Coalition. Mahoney says Mrs. Clinton totally ignored addressing the charges by several women that her husband forced his affections on them -- sometimes violently. He finds Mrs. Clinton's refusal to address those issues involving sexual assault "utterly despicable," adding that it is beyond his understanding how the former First Lady can put herself forward as a "champion of women's rights." Phyllis Schlafly, president of Eagle Forum and author of the book Feminist Fantasies, also feels the former First Lady is not a feminist role model. Schlafly says Mrs. Clinton's feminism is, in fact, a fantasy because she built her career based on being married to Bill Clinton. Schlafly explains that Hillary Clinton is not a "career woman" in the same sense as a Condoleezze Rice or Elizabeth Dole, and did not have a "career of her own" when she moved into the White House. The pro-family leader says Mrs. Clinton's career was built on trying cases before judges who were appointed by her husband when he was governor of Arkansas. As Schlafly puts it: "She really built her original career the old-fashioned way -- she married it." Schlafly does not understand how anyone can take Mrs. Clinton's book Living History seriously. She says it really belongs in a Gothic novel or a "true confessions" magazine. AgapePress News Summary (June 11, 2003)
Deception + Coercion +Apathy = The Fall of America
What the media does not report about Senator Clinton.
Hillary Clinton and Presidential Candidate John Kerry and at least 74 other U.S. Representatives and Senators have signed a GenderPac "Diversity Statement" in support of so-called "transgender" rights in hiring and employment policies for the U.S. Congress. This means that 76 of our representatives in Washington, DC have agreed to hire individuals who are cross-dressers, transsexuals, or even shemales (individuals who maintain both male and female sexual characteristics) as employees if one of these sexually confused individuals applies for a job in Congress. GenderPac is working closely with the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a radical leftist homosexual group based in Washington, DC. With this new alliance of cross-dressers and homosexuals, they are lobbying for federal legislation designed to provide special legal protections for transgenders in the workplace. This means that any businessman will be forced to hire a drag queen, transvestite, or even a shemale if the person is qualified for the job offered. GenderPac is headed by Riki Wilchins, a male-to-female transgender who has written Read My Lips: Sexual Subversion and the End of Gender. Wilchins believes that male and female are "socially constructed" and really don't exist as genetic realities. GenderPac's goal is to destroy any concept of male and female in U.S. law and culture.
Is Hillary Clinton behind "American Family Voices," the group described by NY Times as "secretive" and has used commercials to viciously attack President Bush and his administration. Jennifer Palmieri, Democratic Party spokesperson, revealed that James Carville, a Clinton political attack dog, has significant ties to American Family Voices. Also with ties between Clinton and American Family Voices is the advertising agency of the Glover Park Group, in which former Clinton Press Secretary, Joe Lockhardt, is a partner, as are top Al Gore Presidential Campign advisors, Carter Eskew and Michael Feldman. (Another former top Clinton staff member, Stanley Greenberg, in on the Board of Democrats.com, which began its Bush attacks at the same time as American Family Voices.) Is there an agenda in which Hillary is using the liberal popular media to deceive and coerce the American public with lies and smear campaigns? Do you have ears to hear? As a Senator from New York, why has Hillary already traveled to Iowa? Do you have ears to hear? The money behind Hillary is primarily coming from Hollywood, Labor Union Bosses, and immoral special interest groups such as the Gay and Lesbian lobbies. Do you have ears to hear? If you vote for a Democrat, which reason do you subscribe to?
Deception + Coercion +Apathy = The Fall of America
"I know that during the transition
between the Clinton and Bush administrations that the outgoing administration
told the incoming one that they would spend more time on terrorism and bin Laden
than anything else. And that wasn't their priorities." -- Sen. Mrs. Hillary
Rodham-Clinton-Rodham, protesting military action with Iraq and suggesting that
had the Bush administration only taken hubby Bill's advice to focus on bin
Laden, action against Iraq would not be required.
Friend of The Federalist Ann Coulter responds: "Hillary did not object to precipitous action against Iraq when her husband bombed it on the day of his scheduled impeachment. President Clinton attacked Saddam Hussein without first asking approval from the United Nations, the U.S. Congress or even France. But now we have a president who wants to attack Iraq for purposes of national security rather than his own personal interests, and Hillary thinks he's being rash."
Deception + Coercion +Apathy = The Fall of America
"When you stonewall the Judiciary Committee ... when you act as if you just came out of nowhere and don't have an opinion on anything, everybody knows that's a charade." Hillary Clinton - FYI - Mr. Estrada served from 1992 to 1997 as assistant to the Solicitor General ... for the Clinton administration.
New York Senator Hillary Clinton has issued a statement opposing the deportation of illegal aliens -- even those who can be linked with the 9/11 terrorists. She has also become a very outspoken critic of the Bush Administration, implying complicity in the terrorist attacks and corporate scandals. Paul Rodriguez of Insight magazine says the Empire State's junior senator needs a wake-up call. "Hello, Hillary," Rodriguez quips. "Under whose watch were the airline cockpit door rules established?" But Rodriguez says it is not just her fault. He points out that Republicans also voted for those measures, as well. Rodriguez says the point is that "the blame-game is over." He believes all Washington politicians could benefit from the "just plain honesty" coming from the president these days. AgapePress News Summary (February 14, 2003)
"Clearly we have to make some tough decisions as a country. And one of them ought to be coming up with a much better entry and exit system so that if we're going to let people in for the work that otherwise would not be done, let's have a system that keeps track of them...at least a visa ID, some kind of an entry and exit ID. And, you know, perhaps, although I'm not a big fan of it, we might have to move towards an ID system even for citizens." Hilary Rodham-Clinton
Deception + Coercion +Apathy = The Fall of America
Hillary's Dream Will Be Your Nightmare, A Canadian Warns - By Rachel Marsden - Canada's health care system is its touchstone. Canadians are literally brainwashed into believing that Canada wouldn't be the great country it is without its health care program. According to Canadian lore, America is full of people who are paying through the eyeteeth for medical treatment, and if you're not wealthy, you either don't get the treatment you need, or you declare bankruptcy. Being a Canadian myself, I grew up hearing all about these nightmarish tales of the "evil American health care system." All the while, I was having to go to the doctor three days in a row, only to be turned away each time because the doctor had seen his maximum allowable government-funded quota of patients for the day…